ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

For years the beautiful Renaissance buildings in Palitito have been damaged by exhaust from the many tour buses that come to the city. There has been little parking space, so most buses have idled at the curb during each stop on their tour, and idling produces as much exhaust as driving. The city has now provided parking that accommodates a third of the tour buses, so damage to Palitito's buildings from the buses' exhaust will diminish significantly.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument?

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2760|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

怎么排除D呢

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-8-4 07:50:30 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
For years the beautiful Renaissance buildings in Palitito have been damaged by exhaust from the many tour buses that come to the city.There has been little parking space, so most buses have idledat the curb during each stop on their tour, and idling produces as much exhaust as driving.The city has now provided parking that accommodates a third of the tour buses, so damage to Palitito's buildings from the buses' exhaust will diminish significantly.







Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument?







(A) The exhaust from Palitito's few automobiles is not a significant threat to Palitito's buildings.



(B) Palitito's Renaissance buildings are not threatened by pollution other than engine exhaust.



(C) Tour buses typically spend less than one-quarter of the time they are in Palitito transporting passengers from one site to another.



(D) More tourists come to Palitito by tour bus than by any other single means of transportation.



(E) Some of the tour buses that are unable to find parking drive around Palitito while their passengers are visiting a site.

答案是C,我觉得CD都可加强的,该怎么排除D呢?

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-8-4 10:32:16 | 只看该作者
the conclusion: so damage to Palitito's buildings from the buses' exhaust will diminish significantly.
put it simply: coz of parking zone ==> exhaust decreases ==> less damage to buildings.

D) More tourists come to Palitito by tour bus than by any other single means of transportation.
this answer choice is completely irrelevant to the conclusion. it merely states a possible fact.

to support the conclusion, you need to find something, a new premise, that provides new evidence to support the conclusion - "coz of parking zone ==> exhaust decreases ==> less damage to buildings".

C) 1/4 of time travel, so 3/4 of time idling instead of PARKING.. idling is as polluting as driving. therfore, if new parking zone is available, buses will park. no exhaust during that 3/4 time.

hope it helps
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-19 06:00
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部