ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2135|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求教一道 逻辑

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-6-16 09:41:45 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
From 1978 to 1988, beverage containers accounted for a steadily decreasing percentage of the total weight of household garbage in the United States.  The increasingly widespread practice of recycling aluminum and glass was responsible for most of this decline.  However, although aluminum recycling was more widely practiced in this period than glass recycling, it was found that the weight of glass bottles in household garbage declined by a greater percentage than the weight of aluminum cans.
Which of the following, if true of the United States in the period 1978 to 1988, most helps to account for the finding?
(A) Glass bottles are significantly heavier than aluminum cans of comparable size.
(B) Recycled aluminum cans were almost all beverage containers, but a significant fraction of the recycled glass bottles had contained products other than beverages.
(C) Manufacturers replaced many glass bottles, but few aluminum cans, with plastic containers..
答案是C?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-6-16 09:57:23 | 只看该作者
从你给的这三个选项来看,C是正确的
板凳
发表于 2011-6-16 10:14:43 | 只看该作者
C 。。。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2011-6-16 23:48:14 | 只看该作者
请问原因是什么啊  各位高手 !
5#
发表于 2011-6-16 23:56:27 | 只看该作者
因为回收利用。家庭垃圾中的glass 和aluminum都在减少。但glass减少地更快
原因?

C:现在很多glass都被plastic取代了。用得少了,自然就不会出现在垃圾当中
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-6-17 22:58:20 | 只看该作者
那A   B为啥不对啊
7#
发表于 2011-6-17 23:03:07 | 只看该作者
B  products other than beverages.  没设计
A  说的是一个事实  对文章不能起任何支持和削弱作用  
不要用自己的想法推 就用文中的逻辑链推
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 11:44
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部