ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1337|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Feifei-45,没有搜索到讨论贴

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-9-2 04:29:00 | 只看该作者

Feifei-45,没有搜索到讨论贴

45.Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall of a billion dollars in the coming fiscal year. Since there is no feasible way to increase the available funds, our only choice is to decrease expenditures. The plan before you outlines feasible cuts that would yield savings of a billion dollars over the coming fiscal year. We will be able to solve the problem we face, therefore, only if we adopt this plan.

This reasoning in the commissioner’s argument is flawed because this argument

(A) relies on information that is far from certain

(B) confuses being an adequate solution with being a required solution

(C) inappropriately relies on the opinions of experts

(D) inappropriately employs language that is vague

(E) takes for granted that there is no way to increase available funds

答案是B,这种属于什么类型的题呢

弱弱的问一句怎么分辨adequate solution 和 required solution

我选的是E。。。期待NN的解答,谢谢先!

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2007-9-2 17:14:00 | 只看该作者

怎么没人看啊~55

板凳
发表于 2007-9-3 03:50:00 | 只看该作者
an adequate solution (Sufficient);
 a required solution (Necessary)

"decrease expenditures" is necessary for balancing burget, but may be NOT sufficient.  Why? Because "decrease expenditures" could lead to decrease the income revenue.


地板
发表于 2007-9-3 20:30:00 | 只看该作者
补充一下,我感觉E属于推翻前提,逻辑题里不可以把人家的前提推翻的
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-27 12:48
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部