ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In response to mounting pubic concern, an airplane manufacturer implemented a program with the well-publicized goal of reducing by half the total yearly amount of hazardous waste generated by its passenger-jet division. When the program began in 1994, the division's hazardous waste output was 90 pounds per production worker; last year it was 40 pounds per production worker. Clearly, therefore, charges that the manufacturer's program has not met its goal are false.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2474|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[逻辑小分队] PREP2008 76题 相关因果

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-9-5 14:59:11 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
76题:

Inresponse to mounting public concern, an airplane manufacturer implemented aprogram with the well-publicized goal of reducing by half the total yearlyamount of hazardous waste generated by its passenger-jet division.  When the program began in 1994, thedivision's hazardous waste output was 90 pounds per production worker; lastyear it was 40 pounds per production worker. Clearly, therefore, charges that the manufacturer's program has not metits goal are false.  
Whichof the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A.The amount of nonhazardous waste generated each year by the passenger-jetdivision has not increased significantly since 1994.
B.At least as many passenger jets were produced by the division last year as hadbeen produced in 1994.
C.Since 1994, other divisions in the company have achieved reductions inhazardous waste output that are at least equal to that achieved in thepassenger-jet division.
D.The average number of weekly hours per production worker in the passenger-jetdivision was not significantly greater last year than it was in 1994.
E. The number of production workers assigned to the passenger-jetdivision was not significantly less in 1994 than it was last year.

这道题我的理解是:

因:减排计划的实施
果:人均排污减少了
结论句:制造商的计划达到目标了

理解的可否帮忙解释下正确选项?十分感谢。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2013-9-5 16:53:00 | 只看该作者
这道题选什么呀?
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2013-9-5 17:16:51 | 只看该作者
ashlyzhu 发表于 2013-9-5 16:53
这道题选什么呀?

你分析下啊,看看做的对不对
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2013-9-6 18:46:53 | 只看该作者
有人帮忙解决一下吗?
5#
发表于 2013-9-7 10:52:59 | 只看该作者
leo_changliang 发表于 2013-9-5 17:16
你分析下啊,看看做的对不对

我觉得选E。因为这题的goal:减少total amount of waste. 而后面论证的是用:waste output per production worker.   每个人的waste output不等于总的waste output。所以要在这两个之间建立联系,就是工人的数量问题:只有E说了:1994年的工人数量不必去年的工人数量少太多,就是差不多了。
证明:1994年的waste output per production worker>去年的waste output per production worker
选项E说:1994年的工人数量                               差不多=     去年的工人数量
结论:  1994 总的waste                                       >      去年的总的waste


这是我的理解,对不对呀?
6#
发表于 2013-9-7 11:01:56 | 只看该作者
leo_changliang 发表于 2013-9-6 18:46
有人帮忙解决一下吗?

或者把E取非:看能削弱吗?
E取非:1994年的工人             <             去年的工人数量
题目说:1994的平均工人waste >      去年的平均工人waste
则不能证明1994的总waste比去年的总的waste少。。。所以取非能削弱,

我觉得这题的结构是:program开始,然后1994年的平均每个人的waste比去年的平均每个人的waste少。所以得出结论:program能够帮助实现计划(也就是总的waste减少)= program导致总的waste减少
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-3 03:58
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部