ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1792|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

lsat-2-2-11

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-5-30 13:18:00 | 只看该作者

lsat-2-2-11

11.    “If the forest continues to disappear at its present pace, the koala will approach extinction,” said the biologist.


“So all that is needed to save the koala is to stop deforestation,” said the politician.


Which one of the following statements is consistent with the biologist’s claim but not with the politician’s claim?


(A) Deforestation continues and the koala becomes extinct.


(B) Deforestation is stopped and the koala becomes extinct.


(C) Reforestation begins and the koala survives.


(D) Deforestation is slowed and the koala survives.


(E) Deforestation is slowed and the koala approaches extinction.


我选的是D,请教为什么是B对?谢谢!!!


沙发
发表于 2004-5-31 22:13:00 | 只看该作者
MM找一下吧,记得mindfree曾有个很精彩的解释的
板凳
发表于 2004-6-1 02:55:00 | 只看该作者

论坛的搜索太简陋了, 可能是我不会用吧. 如果搜索好, 很多东西不用手工整理的. 我只在总结里找到这个.

Q:  请教eLSAT SET 2 SECTION II 11

A:  没有问题啊. 从逻辑关系的角度分析:
Biologist: forest disappear (A)--> extinction (B)
Politician: stop deforestation (非A)--> no extinction (非B)
两个论题是不同的, 相当与互为否命题.
B对. stop deforestation, extinction. 按politician的逻辑是不可能发生的, 因为非A-->非B. 但biologist的逻辑依然可以成立. 当A-->B, 非A might or might not lead to 非B

我的意见, 两个不是简单否命题(come on COWS)

Bi forest continues to disappear at its present pace(faster or slower may or may not change the situation, eventhough we think faster is worse)

deforestration at this pace -> may extinct

pol: stop deforestation -> koala surive

D doesn't contrast politician's view.

Deforestation is slowed (perhaps to a level that it stops) and the koala survives.

only B, E confuse me.

use the explanation in quotation, B is correct.

think about the PACE issue, E is out.

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2004-6-1 13:50:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢

谢谢指点,这样一用方法就觉得很清楚了!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 00:34
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部