求教OG-12 104,为什么E不正确？

mijianture · 发表于 2011-5-29 16:58:55

104：

Although the discount stores in Goreville’s central shopping district are expected to close within fi ve years as a
result of competition from a SpendLess discount department store that just opened, those locations will not
stay vacant for long. In the fi ve years since the opening of Colson’s, a nondiscount department store, a new
store has opened at the location of every store in the shopping district that closed because it could not compete
with Colson’s.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
(A) Many customers of Colson’s are expected to do less shopping there than they did before the SpendLess
store opened.
(B) Increasingly, the stores that have opened in the central shopping district since Colson’s opened have been
discount stores.
(C) At present, the central shopping district has as many stores operating in it as it ever had.
(D) Over the course of the next fi ve years, it is expected that Goreville’s population will grow at a faster rate
than it has for the past several decades.
(E) Many stores in the central shopping district sell types of merchandise that are not available at either
SpendLess or Colson’s.

虽然折扣店预期5年内会关门因为竞争不过新开的SL，那些店面不会空久。新开的C店是个非折扣店，就开在其它每个因为竞争不过C店而关掉的店的那条街上。
问削弱。如果切入点是新开的店不会在5年内不敌SL或C店而关门，那E选项不是正好符合吗？OG上的解释是没说店里有供应SL或C店没卖的东西。答案是B，求NN详细解释下推理及过程，感谢。

camelo777 · 发表于 2011-6-1 11:03:41

我说一下我的理解，原文的逻辑是尽管在Goreville’s central shopping district这个地区的D store将会由于竞争者S在五年内关门（潜意思是D store竞争不过S store)，但是这片地区不会空着。后面部分是一个类似的例子，这块很容易让思维出现混乱，在这个例子中C store每挤垮一家店就会有一家新店建立起来（潜意思是在S的case中也应该是同样的）。

B选项削弱，B选项说在C边上开的新店都是D store(这里我们可以理解为普通的nondiscount store竞争不过C），如果是这样的话同样的情况在S选项中就不会发生了，因为D store竞争不过S store啊（两者都是discount store),所以在S周围就不会有新店开了，这样就削弱了原文的结论。

不知道这样解释清不清楚，我也是看了OG的解释才弄明白的，OG的解释其实很好，建议LZ好好看看

求教OG-12 104,为什么E不正确？

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()