ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Brochure: Help conserve our city's water supply. By converting the landscaping in your yard to a water-conserving landscape, you can greatly reduce your outdoor water use. A water-conserving landscape is natural and attractive, and it also saves you money.

Criticism: For most people with yards, the savings from converting to a water-conserving landscape cannot justify the expense of new landscaping, since typically the conversion would save less than twenty dollars on a homeowner's yearly water bills.

Which of the following, if true, provides the best basis for a rebuttal of the criticism?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 4722|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

这道题首先选项的意思就很费解!!!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-11-23 23:50:47 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Brochure:  Help conserve our city’s water supply.  By converting the landscaping in your yard to a water-conserving landscape, you can greatly reduce your outdoor water use.  A water-conserving landscape is natural and attractive, and it also saves you money.
Criticism:  For most people with yards, the savings from converting to a water-conserving landscape cannot justify the expense of new landscaping, since typically the conversion would save less than twenty dollars on a homeowner’s yearly water bills.
Which of the following, if true, provides the best basis for a rebuttal of the criticism?这句话看不懂
A.    Even homeowners whose yards do not have water-conserving landscapes can conserve water by installing water-saving devices in their homes.
B.    A conventional landscape generally requires a much greater expenditure on fertilizer and herbicide than does a water-conserving landscape.
C.    A significant proportion of the residents of the city live in buildings that do not have yards.
D.    It costs no more to put in water-conserving landscaping than it does to put in conventional landscaping.
E.    Some homeowners use more water to maintain their yards than they use for all other purposes combined.

这题到底是让反对criticizm还是支持criticizm呢?
然后答案为什么是B呢??  哪位高手指点一下??
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-11-24 00:29:00 | 只看该作者
rebuttal: criticize, point out shortcoming of another proposal, present counter evidence.  In short, AGAINST the criticism.

B attacks the criticism by adding more reasons for choosing water-conserving landscapes over conventional one.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-11-24 18:31:20 | 只看该作者
D选项说安装water-conserving landscaping 的花费不比安装 conventional landscaping的花费多,岂不是也反驳了题干中的criticism么
地板
发表于 2010-11-24 23:09:36 | 只看该作者
我觉得D的话 不管是不是cost no more, 要改成新的地形就必须有new expense,是要justify这笔费用的必要性
5#
发表于 2010-11-25 17:32:04 | 只看该作者
D选项说安装water-conserving landscaping 的花费不比安装 conventional landscaping的花费多,岂不是也反驳了题干中的criticism么
-- by 会员 lllmmm (2010/11/24 18:31:20)



现在思考的是在已经装了conventional landscaping的情况下是否改造成water-conserving landscaping划算,而不是什么都没有的情况下比较装哪种划算
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-11-25 19:12:23 | 只看该作者
明白了  谢谢诸位!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-27 01:51
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部