ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Many people suffer an allergic reaction to sulfites, including those that are commonly added to wine as preservatives. However, since there are several winemakers producing wine to which no sulfites are added, those who would like to drink wine but are allergic to sulfites can drink these wines without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2780|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

新Prep2-83和90,暂时没人问的

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-5-13 00:22:00 | 只看该作者

新Prep2-83和90,暂时没人问的

83.   (25338-!-item-!-188;#058&001294)


    

 


    

Many
people suffer an allergic reaction to sulfites, including those that are
commonly added to wine as preservatives. 
However, since there are several winemakers producing wine to which no
sulfites are added, those who would like to drink wine but are allergic to
sulfites can drink these wines without risking an allergic reaction to
sulfites.


    

Which
of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?


    

A. Sulfites occur naturally in most
wine.
  


    

B.
The sulfites that can produce an allergic reaction are also commonly found in
beverages other than wine.


    

C.
Wines without added sulfites tend to be at least moderately expensive.


    

D. Apart from sulfites, there are
other substances commonly present in wine that can trigger allergic reactions.
  无关
            


    

E.
Wine without added sulfites sometimes becomes undrinkable even before the wine
is sold to consumers.


思路是“违背原文”比“他因削弱”更most?

----------------------------------------------
90.

X:  In order to reduce the amount of plastic in
landfills, legislatures should impose a ban on the use of plastics for
packaging goods.


    

Y:  Impossible! 
Plastic packaging is necessary for public safety.  Consumers will lose all of the safety
features that plastic offers, chiefly tamper-resistant closures and
shatterproof bottles.


    

Which
of the following best describes the weak point in Y's response to X's proposal?


    

A.
Y ignores the possibility that packaging goods in materials other than plastic
might provide the same safety features that packaging in plastic offers.


    

B.
The economic disadvantages of using plastics as a means of packaging goods are
not taken into consideration.


    

C. Y attempts to shift the blame for
the large amount of plastic in landfills from the users of plastic packaging to
the legislators.


    

D.
Y does not consider the concern of some manufacturers that safety features
spoil package appearances.


    

E.
Y wrongly assumes that X defends the interests of the manufacturers rather than
the interests of the consumers.


    

这个题目不是强调重点在“the weak point in Y's response to X's proposal”么?

A只涉及Y的proposal, 对于X根本就没有提及啊,这个叫 response?

还是因为我把这道题目当作reasoning去作了?

[此贴子已经被作者于2009-5-13 0:26:01编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2010-4-10 23:01:00 | 只看该作者
sigh……这题我也不会,查到讨论结果发现居然没人回复……悲怆……
板凳
发表于 2010-9-14 14:12:50 | 只看该作者
我也不会~
顶一下
地板
发表于 2010-10-5 01:41:30 | 只看该作者
Prep - 90
指出Y的逻辑错误
X:禁用塑料,从而减少塑料垃圾
Y:塑料提供了安全性给消费者,不能禁用塑料

A:Y要的安全性可以用其他替代材料得到

指出用保证安全性来抵制禁用塑料,是weak point
5#
发表于 2010-10-5 08:49:05 | 只看该作者
83题你仔细看题干,题干是说对s的过敏,不是对所有的过敏
6#
发表于 2010-10-27 16:38:23 | 只看该作者
83题,一开始我也选D,但是这个应该是无关的,因为只是说对S过敏,没说对其他东西。。。所以A最好。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-25 22:34
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部