83. (25338-!-item-!-188;#058&001294) Many people suffer an allergic reaction to sulfites, including those that are commonly added to wine as preservatives. However, since there are several winemakers producing wine to which no sulfites are added, those who would like to drink wine but are allergic to sulfites can drink these wines without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? A. Sulfites occur naturally in most wine. B. The sulfites that can produce an allergic reaction are also commonly found in beverages other than wine. C. Wines without added sulfites tend to be at least moderately expensive. D. Apart from sulfites, there are other substances commonly present in wine that can trigger allergic reactions. 无关 E. Wine without added sulfites sometimes becomes undrinkable even before the wine is sold to consumers.
思路是“违背原文”比“他因削弱”更most?
---------------------------------------------- 90.
X: In order to reduce the amount of plastic in landfills, legislatures should impose a ban on the use of plastics for packaging goods. Y: Impossible! Plastic packaging is necessary for public safety. Consumers will lose all of the safety features that plastic offers, chiefly tamper-resistant closures and shatterproof bottles. Which of the following best describes the weak point in Y's response to X's proposal? A. Y ignores the possibility that packaging goods in materials other than plastic might provide the same safety features that packaging in plastic offers. B. The economic disadvantages of using plastics as a means of packaging goods are not taken into consideration. C. Y attempts to shift the blame for the large amount of plastic in landfills from the users of plastic packaging to the legislators. D. Y does not consider the concern of some manufacturers that safety features spoil package appearances. E. Y wrongly assumes that X defends the interests of the manufacturers rather than the interests of the consumers.
这个题目不是强调重点在“the weak point in Y's response to X's proposal”么? A只涉及Y的proposal, 对于X根本就没有提及啊,这个叫 response?
还是因为我把这道题目当作reasoning去作了?
[此贴子已经被作者于2009-5-13 0:26:01编辑过] |