再问狒狒逻辑一题。

cycgundam · 发表于 2012-7-27 09:40:19

Concetta: Franchot was a great writer because she was ahead of her time in understanding that industrialization was taking an unconscionable toll on the family structure of the working class.
Alicia: Franchot was not a great writer. The mark of a great writer is the ability to move people with the power of the written word, not the ability to be among the first to grasp a social issue. Besides, the social consequences of industrialization were widely understood in Franchot’s day.

In her disagreement with Concetta, Alicia does which one of the following?

A.   accepts Concetta’s criterion and then adds evidence to Concetta’s case
B.   discredits Concetta’s evidence and then generalizes from new evidence
C.   rejects Concetta’s criterion and then disputes a specific claim
D.   disputes Concetta’s conclusion and then presents facts in support of an alternative creterion
E.   attacks one of Concetta’s claims and then criticizes the structure of her argumen

求解答，这题我卡CD两项，结果选了个错的。。。先不说答案，想看大家思路如何。

cycgundam · 发表于 2012-7-27 09:41:57

好吧，在点发送的瞬间我就想通了。。。答案C。。。想看看其他人思路是怎样。

renco · 发表于 2012-7-27 11:39:48

如果只是纠结CD的话，D中说否定C的结论然后提出了支持另一评判标准的论据，这是完全错的。C是对的，A做的事情是这样的，首先否定C对一个作家的评判标准，最后还不忘告诉C他所认为的某作者的远见其实早就被大众所共享了，简直就是一文不值。

pinkking · 发表于 2012-7-27 23:19:51

选C，对这种卡下来的要细细研究选项。

D. disputes Concetta’s conclusion and then presents facts in support of an alternative creterion

这个人没有提出alternative的意见啦。

cycgundam · 发表于 2012-7-28 03:08:48

老实说我觉得D确实给了个alternative，但问题是D没有给facts。D的alternative是重新定义greater writer。

silviahelena · 发表于 2012-7-28 18:51:31

选C，她一上来就说一个great writer不是什么什么而是什么什么。她从反对这个定义入手。D最明显的是顺序错了，不是先反对结论再提出一个alternative creterion.

再问狒狒逻辑一题。

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()