ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1997|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD12-10, 没有人问过

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-9-11 13:55:00 | 只看该作者

GWD12-10, 没有人问过

      Acting on the recommen-


       dation of a British government


       committee investigating the


Line       high incidence in white lead


  (5)       factories of illness among


employees, most of whom


were women, the Home Sec-


retary proposed in 1895 that


Parliament enact legislation


(10)      that would prohibit women from


holding most jobs in white lead


factories.  Although the


Women’s Industrial Defence


Committee (WIDC), formed


(15)      in 1892 in response to earlier


legislative attempts to restrict


women’s labor, did not dis-


count the white lead trade’s


potential health dangers, it


(20)      opposed the proposal, view-


       ing it as yet another instance


       of limiting women’s work


opportunities.  Also opposing


the proposal was the Society


(25)      for Promoting the Employment


of Women (SPEW), which


attempted to challenge it by


investigating the causes of ill-


ness in white lead factories.


(30)      SPEW contended, and WIDC


concurred, that controllable


conditions in such factories


       were responsible for the devel-


opment of lead poisoning.


(35)     SPEW provided convincing


evidence that lead poisoning


could be avoided if workers


were careful and clean and


      if already extant workplace


(40)     safety regulations were


stringently enforced.  How-


ever, the Women’s Trade


Union League (WTUL), which


had ceased in the late 1880’s


(45)      to oppose restrictions on


women’s labor, supported the


eventually enacted proposal,


in part because safety regu-


lations were generally not


(50)      being enforced in white lead


factories, where there were no


unions (and little prospect of


any) to pressure employers to


comply with safety regulations.

--------

Q10:


The passage is primarily concerned with


              



  • presenting various groups’ views of the motives of those proposing certain legislation

  • contrasting the reasoning of various groups concerning their positions on certain proposed legislation

  • tracing the process whereby certain proposed legislation was eventually enacted

  • assessing the success of tactics adopted by various groups with respect to certain proposed legislation

  • evaluating the arguments of various groups concerning certain proposed legislation

  • 正确选B,我选A, 我一直在AB中犹豫?最终还是选了A, a 是否侧重点错了,文章是说很多机构的观点,但是重在reasoning? 请问nn,我的观点是否正确?

    沙发
     楼主| 发表于 2005-9-11 15:49:00 | 只看该作者

    我自己顶一下, 快考了,找nn 确认!

    板凳
    发表于 2005-9-11 16:16:00 | 只看该作者

    不是NN,我也做到这题。


    A有两处不妥:1.三个机构是对legislation本身表达看法,而不是the motives of the legislation;


                 2.the Home Sec-


    retary proposed in 1895 that


    Parliament enact legislation


                                  所以 应该是proposed legislation,而不是proposing  legislation。


    文中表达了三个机构的看法,并比较了这些看法原因,B更贴切。


    open to discuss

    地板
    发表于 2007-2-22 22:00:00 | 只看该作者

    恩  有道理  我是选A 的  但是我觉得B也有不妥啊 实际上没有什么比较 啊  只是提出了这几种观点而已啊

    5#
    发表于 2009-8-4 22:25:00 | 只看该作者
    6#
    发表于 2010-9-5 19:59:01 | 只看该作者
    B.    contrasting the reasoning of various groups concerning their positions on certain proposed legislation
    我本来想选B来着,结果看到their positions就觉得很奇怪~谁能给我解释一下这个position在这里是什么意思啊?我觉得文章中没有讲到POSITION啊~
    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-5 12:30
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部