ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3040|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD7-Q14答案是不是有问题啊?

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-7-23 11:29:00 | 只看该作者

GWD7-Q14答案是不是有问题啊?

Q14:
Certain politicians in the country of Birangi argue that a 50 percent tax on new automobiles would halt the rapid increase of automobiles on Birangi’s roads and thereby slow the deterioration of Birangi’s air quality.  Although most experts agree that such a tax would result in fewer Birangians buying new vehicles and gradually reduce the number of automobiles on Birangi’s roads, they contend that it would have little impact on Birangi’s air-quality problem.

Which of the following, if true in Birangi, would most strongly support the experts’ contention about the effect of the proposed automobile tax on Birangi’s air-quality problem?

A. Automobile emissions are the largest single source of air pollution.
B. Some of the proceeds from the new tax would go toward expanding the nonpolluting commuter rail system.
C. Currently, the sales tax on new automobiles is considerably lower than 50 percent.
D. Automobiles become less fuel efficient and therefore contribute more to air pollution as they age.
E. The scrapping of automobiles causes insignificant amounts of air pollution.

这道题答案是D,我怎么觉得E正确?各位都是怎么选的?

沙发
发表于 2007-7-23 11:50:00 | 只看该作者
D 对。新车贵了,大家就不换车了。结果路上车辆没增多,不过都是破车,每辆车的污染增加了。所以总体效果还是污染增加。支持了原文的意思。

E中scrapping of automobiles 说的是销毁车辆这个动作,也就是说汽车销毁场的污染。这个和原文关系不大。而且销毁汽车污染少,对原文的意思是个削弱。

板凳
发表于 2007-8-17 23:57:00 | 只看该作者
thanks
地板
发表于 2009-7-19 16:30:00 | 只看该作者
up
5#
发表于 2010-6-26 00:47:59 | 只看该作者
UP
6#
发表于 2010-8-8 02:13:57 | 只看该作者
E说销毁车辆污染少,还是support contention的,content是说加税没用,加税是为了让少买车,销毁车辆污染少就是多买车污染不会多,只是不如D好。
D的意思如1L所说。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-8 12:05
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部