- UID
- 278465
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2007-9-25
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
转国外论坛的回复 It is a circular reasoning:
premise:Free public education is the best form of education there is
premise:Therefore, we must fight to ensure its continued existence; that is, we must be ready to defend the principle of equality of educational opportunity.
Conclusion:Because this principle is we worth defending, it is clear that free public education is better than any other form of education.
Both conclusion and premise state the same.
A tells the same
(A) I love music, and that’s why I listen to it constantly. I have my stereo or radio on every waking minute. Since I play music all the time, I must really love it. Premise:I love music, and that’s why I listen to it constantly Premise:I have my stereo or radio on every waking minute. Conclusion:Since I play music all the time, I must really love it.
b)Books are my most valuable possessions. My books are like my friends—each pleases me in different ways. Just as I would give up everything to save my friends, so too with my books.
The premise and conclusion are different here. C and D is the same as B
(E) Because every plant I have ever seen has green leaves, I have concluded that all plants must have green leaves. This looks like a plant but it does not have green leaves, so it cannot be a plant.
premise and conclusion are close but not same.. |
|