- UID
- 528521
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2010-4-18
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
大全Test II
Professor A: We must make a strong moral statement against Country X’s policies. Only total divestment – the sale of all stock in companies that have factories or business offices in X – can do this. Therefore, the university should divest totally.
Professor B: Our aim should be to encourage X to change its policies.  artial divestment is the best way to achieve this aim. Therefore, the university should sell its stock only in companies that either sell goods to X’s government, or do the majority of their business in X, or treat their workers in X unfairly.
18. Which of the following, if true, would be evidence that the university would not be harmed economically of it followed Professor A’s recommendation?
A. Very few of the companies in which the university owns stocks sell goods to X’s government.
B. Most companies that have factories or business offices in X and in which the university owns stock actually do little of their business in X.
C. Some companies that have factories or business offices in X and in which the university owns stock have instituted fair treatment policies for their workers in X at very little additional cost to the companies.
D. The expected financial return to the university from stocks that the university could own under a policy of total divestment is appropriately the same as the expected financial return from the same as the expected financial.
E. If the university sold large blocks of stock under a policy of total divestment, the prices of the stocks of the companies whose stocks were sold would probably decrease somewhat.
正确答案是D，我选的是E，我是这样理解的，公司把股票都买光了，然后股票狂跌那就证明了大学卖股票卖对了，那别人亏损了，他已经出手了那不是经济上没有受到损害么？其实题设的具体措施发生的背景我都不是很理解，可能也是阻碍了我的阅读理解题目中的意思，请好心人教一下小弟吧，谢谢了。 |
|
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2010-6-12 20:07:56
收藏
收藏
楼主
