|
The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an organization was circulated to its members for comment. When more than one nominee is to be named for an office, prospective nominees must consent to nomination and before giving such consent must be told who the other nominees will be. Which of the following comments concerning the logic of the proposal is accurate if it cann't be known who the actual nominees are until propospective nomiees have given their consent to be nominated? A) The proposal would make it possible for each of several nominees for an office to be aware of who all of the other nominees are. B) The proposal would widen the choice available to those choosing among the nominees. C) If there are several prospective nominees, the proposal would deny the last nominee equal treatment with the first D) The proposal would enable a prospective nominee to withdraw from competiion with a specific person without making that withdrawal known. E) If there is more than on prospective nominee, the proposal would make it impossible for anyone to become a nominee 答案是E
整个题目我都不大理解是什么意思，有哪位大牛能帮我理清一下这道中的逻辑关系吗？我主要困惑点在 prospective nominee和nominee区别在哪里？还有题目中的意思应该是 prospective知道nominee是before cresent的，但是题干中（if那句话）又说 是 until give consent。我彻底凌乱了。
另外，我感觉A选项挺对的啊。总之恳请CD各位大牛的解答！！！跪谢！！！
| 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2013-7-8 12:49:44
收藏
收藏
