ChaseDream
搜索
1234下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 7657|回复: 32
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[备考日记] 【揽瓜阁2.0】Day10 2020.06.24【社会科学-就业】【社会科学-医疗】

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2020-6-23 20:28:02 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
  揽瓜阁俱乐部第二期
  Day10 2020.06.24


【社会科学-就业】
The case for free speech at work
(614字 精读 必做篇)

Can you really lose your job for posting an opinion on Twitter, or even for clicking “like” on somebody else’s message? Surprising though it may be to employees who expect firms to indulge their odd working hours, their tastes in coffee and their pets, the answer is often yes. Pascal Besselink, an employment lawyer in the Netherlands, reckons that about one in ten abrupt sackings there is connected to behaviour on social media.

Controversial opinions were once expressed in bars after work, and went no further. Today Twitter and other social media broadcast employees’ thoughts; they also make it easy for anyone who is offended to put together a mob and retaliate against the poster and their employer. Jittery firms respond by sacking the offender. Some, like General Motors, have introduced conduct codes which police workers’ speech even when they are not at work.

A firm may judge its self-interest correctly when it punishes workers who speak out. America’s National Basketball Association probably lost hundreds of millions of dollars this season because of a Chinese blackout imposed after the general manager of the Houston Rockets tweeted in support of democracy in Hong Kong. Sacking him would have been costly, too—but not that costly.

Though it is not necessarily in companies’ interests to allow the free expression of opinion, it is clearly in society’s interest. Free speech, including by employees, is a cornerstone of democracy. At the moment workers are too easily gagged.

In countries such as America most employees have scant protection against punitive employers. In others, laws written to protect religious freedom are being extended to govern other beliefs and views. British judges have decided that ethical veganism deserves legal protection. A think-tank was ruled to have acted legally when it did not renew the contract of a researcher after she tweeted that biological sex is immutable. This case-by-case evolution leaves employees and employers unsure which views are acceptable and where.

In laying down clearer rules, legislators should remember that offending and harassing are different. It is not reasonable for companies to try to prevent their employees from expressing displeasure at gay marriage, no matter how strongly others disagree—at least if that is not relevant to the job they do. But an employee who repeatedly says at work that gays are damned, even after being told to stop, has crossed the line into harassment. That should be grounds for dismissal.

There is also a difference between what people do at work and what they do outside. Speech is like a dress code. Just as companies can demand that their employees look the part while at work, they should be able to restrict what they say there, provided they are clear and fair about it. After people go home, though, they should be able to express their opinions freely, just as they are free to change into jeans and a t-shirt. A woman fired in 2004 by a housing firm for displaying a sticker backing John Kerry on her car was poorly treated. The situation is more complicated when it comes to public figures such as sports stars, who in effect sell their image as well as their labour.

Firms will lobby to preserve their freedoms. But robust laws against unfair dismissal that protect speech would help them stand up to complaints from angry mobs and the Chinese government. Politicians should hold their nerve. Many complain that their constituents have become so ideological and tribal that they have forgotten how to talk to those with opposing views. Geographical and technological spaces are increasingly segregated. That makes it all the more important that people encounter different views at work—and especially outside it.

Source: The Economist


【社会科学-医疗】
Inaugural Observance of World Neglected Tropical Diseases Day
(356字 2分54秒 精听 必做篇)

先做精听再核对原文哦~

温馨提示:音频中如听到专有名词不用逐一写下,可以缩写来区分和代替。比如:

Lymphatic Filariasis淋巴丝虫病
Trachoma 沙眼
Onchocerciasis 盘尾丝虫病
Schistosomiasis 血吸虫病


January 30th marks the first-annual observance of World Neglected Tropical Diseases Day. The hope is that raising awareness of these crippling diseases will increase support as well as investment in the fight against them, particularly in the areas most directly affected.

Neglected tropical diseases, or NTDs, are maladies of the poorest of the poor. They are chronic disabling illnesses that thrive in areas with inadequate sanitation and lack of clean drinking water.

NTDs have blinded, disabled, disfigured and killed their victims for centuries. Today, more than 1 billion people suffer with these illnesses. Furthermore, NTDs undermine the future of both the affected individuals and their communities. They lower children’s chances of thriving and of staying in school, as well as the ability of adults to work and be fully active in their communities, thus perpetuating the cycle of poverty.

Nonetheless, most NTDs are frequently preventable or treatable, often with low-cost medications. So, back in 2006, the U.S. Agency for International Development, or USAID, launched the Neglected Tropical Diseases Program, a public-private partnership to treat those who suffer from NTDs, and to help prevent the spread of these diseases by identifying at-risk communities, distributing medicines through mass campaigns, and measuring results.

The program targets the most prevalent neglected tropical diseases that have proven, cost-effective health interventions. These include Lymphatic Filariasis, also known as elephantiasis; blinding Trachoma; Onchocerciasis, or River Blindness; Schistosomiasis, which is sometimes called snail fever; and illnesses caused by the Soil Transmitted Helminths hookworm, roundworm, and whipworm.

Since the program began in 2006, USAID has helped leverage 22 billion dollars in donated drugs from five pharmaceutical companies. That has allowed 2.6 billion treatments of medicine to go to 1.3 billion people, or 1 out of every 6 people around the globe. Thus far, 10 USAID-supported countries have eliminated at least one neglected tropical disease as a public health problem.

The United States believes that the first-annual World Neglected Tropical Diseases Day kicks off an important year in the fight against neglected diseases of poverty. Reducing the burden of disease and disability caused by NTDs is essential to improving the lives of the world’s poorest people.

Source: VOA


【笔记格式要求】

精读笔记格式要求:
1.总结文章中心大意
2.总结分论点或每段段落大意
3.摘抄印象深刻或者觉得优美的句子
4.总结文章中的生词
5.记录阅读时间、总结时间、总时间

精听笔记格式要求:
1.逐句听写整篇文章
2.对照原文修改听写稿,标记出错原因
3.总结文章中心大意
4.总结精听过程中的生词
5.记录听写时间、总结时间、总时间

这里也给大家两点学习小建议哦~
精读:如遇到读不懂的复杂句,建议找出句子主干,分析句子成分,也可以尝试翻译句子来帮助理解~
精听:建议每句不要反复纠结听,如果听 5 遍都没听出来,那就跳过,等完成后再回听总结原因,时间宝贵,不要过于执着哦~



本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2020-6-23 20:28:19 | 只看该作者
揽瓜阁俱乐部,自「language」一词谐音而来,是一个为帮助大家提升英语语言能力而建立的学习小团队。在这里,我们将定时发布涵盖各类话题的外刊语料,供大家练习精听、精读。同时还设置了严格的打卡机制,督促大家克服懒惰坚持学习。

同时我们也招募volunteer协助维护团队,确保学习活动顺利开展~大家一起营造积极向上的学习氛围~

想要提升英语能力的小伙伴,快快添加微信(theTOEFL)报名加入吧,让妥妥带你观尽天下新鲜事,览遍四海热议瓜~


如果你想加入,可以直接在本帖下完成你的学习笔记!如果想进入学习群聊,请直接联系妥妥。
板凳
发表于 2020-6-24 10:58:15 | 只看该作者
day 10 打卡

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
地板
发表于 2020-6-24 11:57:08 | 只看该作者
阅读笔记


中心大意:网络世界让人们联系的更紧密,也导致了不恰当的个人观点在网上出现后,公司会处于一定的考量而解雇该员工的事件发生。

第一段:最近,荷兰已经有员工因为在Twitter上发表意见和点赞,而失去了工作。

第二段:如今,Twitter已经成为了人们可以随意表达意见的场所,甚至有极端者在上面发布和组织进行暴力活动。

第三段:公司则会从经济利益来考虑,是否对发表某些言论的员工采取措施。

第四段:公司的利益,有时会与员工表达个人意见相冲突。

第五段:在不同的国家,雇员的个人表达是否会收到保护,各国也都有不同的法规。

第六段:而且,犯罪与骚扰,理论上需要一个明确的界限。但这在具体执行时会比较敦南。

第七段:人在工作中和日常生活中其实在扮演两种角色,应该对工作表现和私人行为有所区分。

第八段:网络世界模糊了物理世界中的距离,也模糊了工作场所和生活场合。

句子摘抄:

Surprising though it may be to employees who expect firms to indulge their odd working hours, their tastes in coffee and their pets, the answer is often yes.

In laying down clearer rules, legislators should remember that offending and harassing are different.

It is not reasonable for companies to try to prevent their employees from expressing displeasure at gay marriage, no matter how strongly others disagree—at least if that is not relevant to the job they do.

Just as companies can demand that their employees look the part while at work, they should be able to restrict what they say there, provided they are clear and fair about it.

生词摘抄:

abrupt a.生硬的,陡峭的

controversial a.争议的

legislator n.立法者

harassment n.骚扰,烦恼

nerve n.勇气,神经

segregated a.被隔离的

阅读时间11分钟 总结时间27分钟 总时间 38分钟

听力笔记


文章大意:
1月30日是世界被忽视热带疾病日,在热带很多不发达国家,血吸虫病的热带疾病给当地人民的健康带来了很大的威胁,甚至影响到了青少年的教育与发展。建立这个世界热带疾病日,有助于唤起全球对这些地区的抗病工作的重视,让当地获得更多的医疗帮助。

生词摘抄:

neglected a.被忽视的

inadequate a.不充分的,不恰当的

sanitation n.卫生环境

pharmaceutical a.制药的

intervention n.干预

听写时间28分钟 总结时间30分钟 总时间58分钟



本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
5#
发表于 2020-6-24 12:24:34 发自 iPhone | 只看该作者
MJ-MJ

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
6#
发表于 2020-6-24 13:32:11 | 只看该作者
揽瓜阁 Day 10
Dovis 2020 6 24
精读 The case for free speech at work
一 文章大意
由于社交媒体的广泛传播,员工个人的不恰当言谈举止容易遭致反对者抵制本人及其雇主。因此,公司出于自身利益考虑,会对发布人进行惩罚甚至开除。虽则如此,言论自由是民主的基石,不同观点的碰撞也十分必要。
二 段落总结
  • 尽管员工认为非工作时间个人的行为和媒体言论不应该作为雇主解雇的依据,但事实证明并非如此。
  • 在社交平台发展迅速的今天,个人有争议的言论很容易被放大,导致一些持有反对意见的人抵制发布人及其雇主。一些雇主会撰写行为规范来约束员工,甚至一些公司会解雇这类员工。
  • 一般公司出于利益考量都会惩罚发布人。比如NBA某人发布支持GD言论导致NBA数百万美元的经济损失。
  • 员工言论自由不一定符合公司的利益,但一定是符合社会的利益的。自由是民主的基石。
  • 员工和雇主因为不同的个人言论保护法规,常常不清楚言论自由的边界和底线在哪里。
  • 冒犯性言论和侮辱性言论是不一样的。雇主不会因为你在同性婚姻上发表了不快言论就惩罚你,因为这与工作本身无关。但如果你在工作期间发表,甚至遇到阻止也没有停下时,这可以算做是侮辱,可能遭致解雇的处罚了。
  • 员工工作时作为公司的一份子应当管控自己的言行,私下言行和公司行为应当有所区别。
  • 地理和技术空间日益分离的情况下,这使得人们在工作中(尤其是在工作场所之外)遇到不同的观点变得更加重要。
三 生词摘录
indulge 沉湎,沉迷,沉溺(于…); 满足(欲望、兴趣等); 放纵; 听任
reckon 被普遍认为是; 被看作是; 料想; 预计;
sack 解雇
retaliate 报复; 反击; 复仇
mob 人群; (尤指) 暴民; 一群,
gag 封口布; 塞口布; 禁刊令(阻止公开报道或讨论某事的法令); (尤指专业喜剧演员的) 插科打诨,笑话,噱头;捂住,塞住(某人的嘴); 压制…的言论自由; 使缄默; 作呕
scant 一丁点的; 微小的; 不足的; 欠缺的
tweeted (小鸟的) 唧啾,吱喳
robust 强健的; 强壮的; 结实的; 耐用的; 坚固的; 强劲的; 富有活力的;
segregate 隔离并区别对待(不同种族、宗教或性别的人); (使) 分开,分离,隔离
四 句子摘抄
Surprising though it may be to employees who expect firms to indulge their odd working hours, their tastes in coffee and their pets, the answer is often yes.

Free speech, including by employees, is a cornerstone of democracy.
五 用时记录
通读4.5 min 总结32min 共计 40min

7#
发表于 2020-6-24 20:29:59 | 只看该作者
llzzzzzy 打卡day10

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
8#
发表于 2020-6-24 20:41:13 | 只看该作者
Day10

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
9#
发表于 2020-6-24 20:46:24 | 只看该作者
打卡~

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
10#
发表于 2020-6-24 20:59:55 发自 iPhone | 只看该作者
Day 10

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: TOEFL / IELTS



近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-22 06:07
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部