ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances. A petition entitled "Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction" is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, "Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?" The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.

Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?

正确答案: C

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 4487|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

tt gwd 15-38 搜索了目前为止没有好的解答和结论

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-11-12 20:56:00 | 只看该作者

tt gwd 15-38 搜索了目前为止没有好的解答和结论

In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances.  A petition entitled “Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction” is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, “Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?”  The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.

 

Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?

 

  1. Health costs associated with smoking cause health insurance premiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers.

  2. In rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public.

  3. The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.

  4. There is considerable sentiment among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking.

  5. The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard.

沙发
发表于 2006-11-12 23:24:00 | 只看该作者
这题我怎么看都像是B.我觉得主要是最后一句话,The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public. 说这东西在这些地方禁止,然后问被访者愿不愿意sign。如果被访者在的地方压根木有这些设施,被访者就会无所谓,所以会被be misled to sign or not to sign. 哪位高人指点一下呢
板凳
发表于 2006-12-21 13:16:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用pinkcutie在2006-11-12 20:56:00的发言:

In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances.  A petition entitled “Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction” is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, “Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?”  The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.

 

 

Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?

 

 

  1. Health costs associated with smoking cause health insurance premiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers.

  2. In rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public.

  3. The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.

  4. There is considerable sentiment among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking.

  5. The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard.

这道题想了很久,顺着答案E的思路谈点个人看法:

题干: 很多州的城镇都有禁烟法令,一份被冠以“要求全州推广禁烟法”的请愿书被分发到投票人手中,而只被问及“你是否愿意签署这份全州推广禁烟令的请愿书”。这份请愿书的真正目的是要求州法律在零售或者政府服务等向公众开放的部门禁烟。
问题:下列何种情况会使投票人产生“将地方法令推广到全州”的误解

分析:
要使投票人的这一误解成立,必须满足条件即,州法律会沿用目前的地方法令,不做更改,如果州法律会更改或取代目前的地方法令,那么就不可能产生“将地方法令推广到全州”的误解

所以答案E:The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard.

州法律不会影响现存的地方禁烟法令。。。。。应该是最合适的

不知道我的理解对不对,请指正

地板
发表于 2006-12-21 15:12:00 | 只看该作者

different opinion:

Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters [who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide]?

That means which of the following will mislead the voters who has gotten the the proposal understood as the local ordinances statewide.

Choice C in which says that state will deter the local laws which are much stronger and stricter than state laws.That means the level of limition will decrease not increase,such as extending the local ordinaces statewide.

That means which of the following will mislead the voters who has gotten the the proposal understood as the local ordinances statewide.

Choice C in which says that state will deter the local laws which are much stronger and stricter than state laws.That means the level of limition will decrease not increase,such as extending the local ordinaces statewide.

5#
发表于 2006-12-21 16:14:00 | 只看该作者

看来关键还是怎么理解题目

C和E是两个截然相反的答案

楼上的认为是这些人有这样的想法,误导就是和他们的想法相反,所以选C

我的理解是误导这些人使他们产生了这样的想法,所以选E

我觉得如果按照楼上的思路问题应该是Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading  voters [who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide]?     misleading 后面不应该加“to”

而实际问题是Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters [who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide]? 是误导成为怎样的人。

6#
发表于 2006-12-21 16:54:00 | 只看该作者

No,question is asking us to find a chice that get such kind of misleaded.

As the question cited in the argument,“Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?” ,all the people asked will have a clear picture of proposal that will be extended to statewide.

7#
发表于 2006-12-21 17:17:00 | 只看该作者

I think both the title of the petition and the question asked by the campaign worker misled the voters to understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide.

and the question is

Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?

8#
发表于 2007-1-8 17:31:00 | 只看该作者

求NN啊,我后天就考了,这题我读了N遍,应该就是C啊!!!!

求NNN

9#
发表于 2007-5-9 12:06:00 | 只看该作者

make petition misleading(adj)是一个make sth adj.的固定搭配,意为使sth易被误解。to voter who... 意为对voter而言。这个问题问的是,对于认为州法案是地方法案的扩展的人来说,下列哪个情况使得请愿书(petition as circulated)是误导的。

对于这个情况,voter们是不知道的。题目说了因为他们认为州法案是对地方法案的扩展,所以他们理所当然认为请愿书的意思就是支持地方法扩展为州法。但是这个情况的发生使得州法案不是地方法案的扩展,所以才会造成他们对请愿书的认识是误解。

E选项说州法不会影响地方法中的一些现行规定,所以会有两种可能:一是州法与地方法一致,二是地方法中的这些规定,州法中不加以限制。如果是情况一,“州法是地方法的扩展执行”仍可能成立。所以E 不一定造成误解。

很明显,答案为C。

10#
发表于 2007-5-9 12:19:00 | 只看该作者

补充:

请愿书为:支持州法。

voter们认为:州法是地方法的扩展,所以他们认为请愿书的“支持州法”就是“支持扩展地方法为州法”的意思。

题目说这个请愿书对于认为州法是地方法扩展的人而言,是易被误解的。也就是认为“支持州法”等于支持“地方法扩展为州法”的认识是错误的。即州法不是地方法的扩展。

大家说呢?

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-9 06:02
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部