ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1931|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG12 40 请教!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-1-21 03:04:28 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
40. In the last decade there has been a significant

decrease in coffee consumption. During this same

time, there has been increasing publicity about the

adverse long-term effects on health of the caffeine in

coffee. Therefore, the decrease in coffee consumption

must have been caused by consumers’ awareness of

the harmful effects of caffeine.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously calls into

question the explanation above?

(A) On average, people consume 30 percent less

coffee today than they did 10 years ago.

(B) Heavy coffee drinkers may have mild withdrawal

symptoms, such as headaches, for a day or so

after significantly decreasing their coffee

consumption.

(C) Sales of specialty types of coffee have held

steady as sales of regular brands have declined.

(D) The consumption of fruit juices and caffeine-free

herbal teas has increased over the past decade.

(E) Coffee prices increased steadily in the past

decade because of unusually severe frosts in

coffee-growing nations.

正确答案是E,我错选了C。但是这道题与之前的题一比较,我就感觉E与原题讲述的东西没有关系啊,原题没有牵扯价格,正如OG 10 186题

36. Offshore oil-drilling operations entail an unavoidable

risk of an oil spill, but importing oil on tankers

presently entails an even greater such risk per

barrel of oil. Therefore, if we are to reduce the risk of

an oil spill without curtailing our use of oil, we must

invest more in offshore operations and import less oil

on tankers.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens

the argument above?

(A) Tankers can easily be redesigned so that their

use entails less risk of an oil spill.

(B) Oil spills caused by tankers have generally been

more serious than those caused by offshore

operations.

(C) The impact of offshore operations on the

environment can be controlled by careful

management.

(D) Offshore operations usually damage the ocean

floor, but tankers rarely cause such damage.

(E) Importing oil on tankers is currently less

expensive than drilling for it offshore.

正确答案A

感觉两个题刚好是相反的,我也刚好都选择了错误的答案。这种削弱题应该只要有另外一个相反的观点也能达成原结论就可以了吧?为什么186题不能选D或者E呢?

诚心请教,在此谢过!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-1-21 21:02:06 | 只看该作者

抛砖引玉

其实这两道题是有区别的
40题是因果关系:咖啡销量下降 是因为 意识到咖啡因的危害
E选项加入他因:价格增长----说明了销量下降不一定是意识到咖啡因的危害,削弱

186题(没看错的话也是OG12的36题)
这个是两者在比较,要比较离岸作业和把油用tanker运进来哪个更好,presently, 后者漏油更多,所以前者更优
A选项:针对presently, 说后者很容易改进----也就是说以后可能就是前者漏油多了,所以削弱
板凳
发表于 2010-1-22 00:14:25 | 只看该作者
第一题没有说到价格,并不说明价格就是完全无关。 这里的推理是人们意识到咖啡的危害, 和咖啡销量下降发生在同一时间,所以结论认为人们的认识是咖啡销量下降的原因。 这里并没有完整的推理, 只要找出其他的可以解释销量下降的原因就可以削弱了。

第二题判断选哪种方法是基于oil spill的risk
d中说到了对sea bed的损害, 和题目无关
e中说到价钱, 也不是选择的时候考虑的要素。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2010-1-22 05:25:45 | 只看该作者
多谢指教!

我又好好悟了一下,现在感觉36题的主要问题在于结论中

Therefore, if we are to reduce the risk of

an oil spill without curtailing our use of oil, we must

invest more in offshore operations and import less oil

on tankers.

首先前提就是要降低漏油的风险,然后要如何改变。从这个角度来讲,价格确实是无关的。

不知道这样理解对不对?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-24 02:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部