ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2382|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

CXD逻辑,请进

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-12-18 21:51:18 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
 10. Editorial:

  Critics of nuclear power complain about the allegedly serious harm that might result from continued operation of existing nuclear power plants. But such concerns do not justify closing these plants;after all, their operation has caused no more harm than that caused by pollution generated by coal-and oil-burning power plants, the most important other sources of energy.   Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) Existing nuclear power plants should be closed only if it can be conclusively demonstrated that their continued operation is likely to cause harm more serious than the harm their operation has already caused.

(B) Closing existing nuclear power plants would require greatly increased reliance on coal-and oil-burning power plants.

(C) The harm that has resulted from operation of existing coal and oil-burning power plants has been significant.

(D) The harm that a nuclear power plant is likely to cause as it continues to operate can be reliably predicted from the past history of nuclear power plants.

(E) The only harm that has resulted from operation of existing coal and oil-burning power plants has resulted from the pollution generated by these plants.

c与d之间产生争议
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2009-12-18 22:09:13 | 只看该作者
选D吗
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-12-18 22:39:47 | 只看该作者
对,为什么
地板
发表于 2009-12-18 22:45:24 | 只看该作者
原文 结论是 应该不应该关闭那些 nuclear 的厂子
    论据是  nuclear产生污染的数量和那些什么coal 的厂子一样多 那些工厂都没关。。所以nuclear得工厂也不应该关
    对D否定 就是未来的污染不确定,,正好否定了原文的结论
这个就是答案了。。。呵呵
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-12-20 12:01:26 | 只看该作者

有点不同意

原文 结论是 应该不应该关闭那些 nuclear 的厂子
   论据是  nuclear产生污染的数量和那些什么coal 的厂子一样多 那些工厂都没关。。所以nuclear得工厂也不应该关
c项,说明什么coal的厂子那么多,污染那么明显,而且都没关,所以nuclear的工厂也不应该关.
我是这样理解的,是否可以呢
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-12-23 22:10:41 | 只看该作者
up
7#
发表于 2009-12-23 22:45:20 | 只看该作者
你对文章的重点把握错了,应该是这句话,前半截的你可以忽略,不考虑。their operation has caused no more harm than that caused by pollution generated by coal-and oil-burning power plants, the most important other sources of energy。
nuclear 比coal的harm小,C选项说coal的非常大,能说明nuclear比coal的小还是大么??
D说nuclear的harm可以从历史数据中计算出来,忽略了其他因素造成的harm,比如核泄漏,这个文中是没有说,你不能用你的常识来解决逻辑题的问题。
8#
发表于 2009-12-23 22:47:02 | 只看该作者
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends

不是说结论的assumption,而是论据的assumption
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-28 20:13
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部