ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1757|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教 新PP1 76

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-11-6 21:39:35 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式


Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

According to experts on shopping behavior, more shoppers would shop at Jerrod’s department store if they were offered the convenience of shopping carts.  In fact, even if the amount spent by these additional customers only just covered the cost of providing the carts, providing carts would still probably increase Jerrod’s profits, since _______.

A. the layout of Jerrod’s is open enough to accommodate shopping carts comfortably

B. several department stores that compete with Jerrod’s have begun to make shopping carts available to their customers

C. there are some potential customers who would not be enticed to shop at Jerrod’s by the availability of shopping carts

D. stores that make shopping carts available to customers usually have to hire people to retrieve them from parking areas

E. a customer with a shopping cart buys more, on average, than a customer without a cart

====================

答案是E ,但不是说多来的顾客花的只能COVER这个服务的费用吗?那E选项这些单个顾客花多少又有什么关系呢?反正只能COVER整个费用,不能增加利润

求解!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2009-11-6 23:06:42 | 只看该作者
他说的是多来的顾客花的钱只够支付提供shopping carts的花费,但是原来的顾客因为有了shopping carts买的东西多了,虽然多来的顾客那里没有利润,但是原来的顾客的利润增加了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-30 05:35
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部