请教NN一道逻辑题

73. There is no reason why the work of scientists has to be officially confirmed before being published. There is a system in place for the confirmation or disconfirmation of scientific findings, namely, the replication of results by other scientists. Poor scientific work on the part of any one scientists, which can include anything from careless reporting practices to fraud, is not harmful. It will be exposed and rendered harmless when other scientists conduct experiments and obtain disconfirmatory results.

Which one of the following, if true, would weaken the argument? ???

(A) Scientific experiments can go unchallenged for many years before they are replicated.

(B) Most scientists work in universities, where their work is submitted to peer review before publication.

(C) Most scientists are under pressure to make their work accessible to the scrutiny of replication.

(D) In scientific experiments, careless reporting is more common than fraud.

(E) Most scientists work as part of a team rather than alone.

答案选A，确实不懂~

我正好和楼上思考的意思相反~~

我认为题干是说错误的科学试验不会带来太大的损失

A说的是在Replicated之前，科学实验会实施好多年。是削弱题干 错误的试验不会立刻被其他科学家立即发现，从而带来损失 

题干的结论是错误没关系 会很快给揪出来

A 说的就是不会很快给揪出来

你的思路和我是一样嘛

厄 我理解错了 能帮忙看看OG12-104吗？

没有OG12 你可以把题目贴上来看看

你也可以这么理解 结论是说即使disconfirmatory的科学成果也没有危害, 原因在于多数的这类成果很快会被其他人证明有误

A 反对了题干中作者的前提 或者说反对了原因 所以削弱了结论