[求助]GWD30-36 11/28要考了 麻烦大家帮忙看一下

(The following was excerpted from material written in 1988.)

      For over a decade the

        most common policy advice

        given to developing countries

Line
                    by international development

  (5)        institutions has been to copy

the export-oriented path of the

newly industrializing countries,

the celebrated NIC’s.  These

economies—Brazil, Hong

 (10)        Kong, Mexico, Singapore,

South Korea, and Taiwan—

burst into the world manufac-

turing market in the late 1960’s

and the 1970’s; by 1978 these

 (15)        six economies, along with India,

enjoyed unequaled growth

rates for gross national product

and for exports, with exports

accounting for 70 percent of

 (20)        the developing world’s manu-

        factured exports.  It was,

        therefore, not surprising that

dozens of other countries

attempted to follow their model,

 (25)        yet no countries—with the pos-

sible exceptions of Malaysia

and Thailand—have even

approached their success.  In

“No More NIC’s,” Robin Broad

 (30)        and John Cavanagh search for

the reasons behind these fail-

ures, identifying far-reaching

        changes in the global econ-

omy—from synthetic substitutes

 (35)
                         for commodity exports to

unsustainable levels of foreign

debt—as responsible for a glut

economy offering little room for

       new entrants.  Despite these

 (40)       changes, the authors maintain,

the World Bank and the Inter-

national Monetary Fund—the

foremost international devel-

opment institutions—have

 (45)        continued to promote the NIC

path as the way for heavily

indebted developing countries

to proceed.  And yet the futility

of this approach should,

 (50)        according to the authors, be

all too apparent so many years

into a period of reduced growth

in world markets.

一点拙见，不知当否：

1、40行开始到最后；

2、是说那些没有成功转型的发展中国家之所以失败的原因：从出口商品的综合替代品到这些国家的不可维持的外债水平。

这是本月JJ吗?

了解了 
謝謝熱心的seraphh 感激不盡阿

to sigrid920 mm
好像不是

不用客气，互相帮助。

Despite these
            changes, the authors maintain,
            the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund—the
            foremost international development institutions—have
            continued to promote the NIC
                path as the way for heavily
            indebted developing countries
            to proceed.
                

WB和IMF仍旧在给高强度外债的发展中国家使用NIC path，（代表上面两个人是不认同这种做法的）