ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2464|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

跪请大牛:GWD-12-Q11

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-9-11 12:20:00 | 只看该作者

跪请大牛:GWD-12-Q11

In general, jobs are harder to get in times of economic recession because many businesses cut back operations.  However, any future recessions in Vargonia will probably not reduce the availability of teaching jobs at government-funded schools.  This is because Vargonia has just introduced a legal requirement that education in government-funded schools be available, free of charge, to all Vargonian children regardless of the state of the economy, and that current student-teacher ratios not be exceeded.

 

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

 

  1. The current student-teacher ratio at Vargonia’s government-funded schools is higher than it was during the most recent period of economic recession.

  2. During recent periods when the Vargonian economy has been strong, almost 25 percent of Vargonian children have attended privately funded schools, many of which charge substantial fees.

本题选B,怎么感觉这么别扭呢?

是因为经济环境好的时候,学生都跑到收费私人学校了,那么经济环境差的时候这帮学生又会跑回政府资助的学校,而学生与教师比例不变,那么教师就必然增加?

是这个意思么?请大牛指点,不胜感激之

沙发
发表于 2008-9-11 13:53:00 | 只看该作者
基本就是这个意思
板凳
发表于 2008-9-11 15:57:00 | 只看该作者

就是这个意思啊

经济不好的时候很多学生在私立学校,到经济不好了必然跑回公立学校读书

学校有义务接受他们,则就需要更多的老师,因此在那里工作反而变得好找

地板
发表于 2008-10-19 17:48:00 | 只看该作者

为什么C不对呢? 是因为题目说的是FUTURE RECESSION吗? 所以现在的20 percent more teacher are currently employed...不能作为直接加强?

5#
发表于 2008-12-21 22:34:00 | 只看该作者

终于明白啦~~~

感谢楼上的各位NN

6#
发表于 2009-7-17 14:30:00 | 只看该作者
7#
发表于 2009-7-29 21:59:00 | 只看该作者

up

这道题好绕


[此贴子已经被作者于2009/7/29 22:02:14编辑过]
8#
发表于 2009-8-1 17:17:00 | 只看该作者
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 19:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部