ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1936|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]L2001/06-2-21

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-3-3 23:15:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]L2001/06-2-21

L2001/06-2-21fficeffice" />

Professor Chan: The literature department’s undergraduate courses should cover only true literary works, and not such frivolous material as advertisements.


Professor Wigmore: Advertisements might or might not be true literary works but they do have a powerfully detrimental effect on society—largely because people cannot discern their real messages. The literature department’s courses give students the critical skills to analyze and understand texts. Therefore, it is the literature department’s responsibility to include the study of advertisements in its undergraduate courses.


21.Which one of the following is an assumption on which Professor Wigmore’s argument depends?


(A) Texts that are true literary works never have a detrimental effect on society.


(B) Courses offered by the literature department cannot include both true literary works and material such as advertisement.


(C) Students who take courses in the literature department do not get from those courses other skills besides those needed to analyze and understand texts.


(D) Forms of advertising that convey their message entirely through visual images do not have a detrimental effect on society.B


(E) The literature department’s responsibility is not limited to teaching students how to analyze true literary works.


    


Answer is B; Why E is not right?


W: adsdetrimental effect +student应当给予analyze critical skills->应当include ads.


E取非后为文学系将限定课程在教授学生分析true literary works不是否定了教授的可能性吗?


B:取非后不能说明教授ads是因为允许教授还是因为应当教给学生critical skill所置, 排除他因.


Puzzled?

沙发
发表于 2004-3-3 23:38:00 | 只看该作者
E 我认为Advertisements might be true literary works, 所以错。


b吗, 简单理解就是Professor Chan的原话的意思。Professor Wigmore说那么多就是反对Professor Chan的观点,要求advertisements也能成为courses一部分。如果b否成立,也就是Professor Chan的观点是对的,Professor Wigmore说那么多也就没有了意义。


    

板凳
发表于 2004-3-3 23:41:00 | 只看该作者
更正:如果b否成立,也就是Professor Chan的观点已经错了。
地板
发表于 2004-3-3 23:47:00 | 只看该作者
做的快,这样想是可以的。不过这种想法还是有点怪,似乎跟Professor Wigmore’s argument 好像没有直接的联系。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-20 21:59
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部