ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

A certain mayor has proposed a fee of five dollars per day on private vehicles entering the city, claiming that the fee will alleviate the city's traffic congestion. The mayor reasons that, since the fee will exceed the cost of round-trip bus fare from many nearby points, many people will switch from using their cars to using the bus.

Which of the following statements, if true, provides the best evidence that the mayor's reasoning is flawed?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2259|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]prep1—59 谢谢各位了

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-7-2 19:35:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]prep1—59 谢谢各位了

prep1-59

A certain mayor has proposed a fee of five dollars per day on private vehicles entering the city, claiming that the fee will alleviate the city's traffic congestion.  The mayor reasons that, since the fee will exceed the cost of round-trip bus fare from many nearby points, many people will switch from using their cars to using the bus.

 Which of the following statements, if true, provides the best evidence that the mayor's reasoning is flawed?

 Which of the following statements, if true, provides the best evidence that the mayor's reasoning is flawed?

 (A) Projected increases in the price of gasoline will increase the cost of taking a private vehicle into the city.

 (A) Projected increases in the price of gasoline will increase the cost of taking a private vehicle into the city.

(B) The cost of parking fees already makes it considerably more expensive for most people to take a private vehicle into the city than to take a bus.

(C) Most of the people currently riding the bus do not own private vehicles.

(D) Many commuters opposing the mayor's plan have indicated that they would rather endure traffic congestion than pay a five-dollar-per day fee.

(E) During the average workday, private vehicles owned and operated by people living within the city account for twenty percent of the city's traffic congestion.

对于答案B没有什么疑问  但想请教大家是怎么排除E的 是E的比例削弱的不够彻底么  谢谢

沙发
发表于 2009-7-3 01:17:00 | 只看该作者
20%太少了,不足以确立城市交通拥挤是市内车辆造成的。起码要50%以上才行。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-7-3 10:00:00 | 只看该作者
就是说不够彻底的关系么 明白了 谢谢
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-1 05:17
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部