ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1464|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

狒狒逻辑26~~请教

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-5-1 10:44:00 | 只看该作者

狒狒逻辑26~~请教

26. Barnes: The two newest employees at this company have salaries that are too high for the simple tasks normally assigned to new employees and duties that are too complex for inexperienced

workers. Hence, the salaries and the complexity of the duties of these two newest employees should be reduced.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which Barnes’s argument depends?

(A) The duties of the two newest employees are not less complex than any others in the company.

(B) It is because of the complex duties assigned that the two newest employees are being paid more than is usually paid to newly hired employees.

(C) The two newest employees are not experienced at their occupations.

(D) Barnes was not hired at a higher-than-average starting salary.

(E) The salaries of the two newest are no higher than the salaries that other companies pay for workers with a similar level of experience.

我觉得是A哈~~A取非:两个新雇员的职责已经比其他人更小了。(因为这个公司的起点就很高)说明已经不能再降低了,不是也削弱原结论么?

我的想法哪里不对呢??谢谢~~

沙发
发表于 2009-5-1 11:01:00 | 只看该作者

这题不要用not+weaken做,直接看更简单:

公司结论是,降低新来的人的薪水和责任,前提是the simple tasks normally assigned to new employees and duties that are too complex for inexperienced
        

workers,中间的GAP即公司认为新来的就是没有经验的,没能力承担复杂责任的——这个就是结论成立的假设即答案了。

A取非后相当于是无关,无法削弱结论的,削弱的是前提

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-5-1 16:56:00 | 只看该作者

哦哦。。。原来是从gap角度考虑~~的    谢谢NN哈!!

BTW---我之前模考了一次逻辑11错2  感觉到瓶颈状态了 于是有人建议做狒狒

请问还有什么好方法突破瓶颈不??

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-10 12:11
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部