ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1940|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG12-07 A选项不懂OG的解释 【已解决】

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-1-9 13:23:08 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
原文:
A recent study has provided clues to predator prey dynamics in the late Pleistocene era. Researchers compared the number of tooth fractures in present-day carnivores with tooth fractures in carnivores that lived 36,000 to 10,000 years ago and that were preserved in the Rancho La Breatar pits in Los Angeles. The breakagefrequencies in the extinct species were strikingly higher than those in the present-day species.



In considering possible explanations for this finding, the researchers dismissed demographic bias because older individuals were not overrepresented in the fossil samples. They rejected preservational bias because a total absence of breakage in two extinct species demonstrated that the fractures were not the result of abrasion within the pits.They ruled out local bias because breakage data obtained from other Pleistocene sites were similar to the La Brea data. The explanation they consider most plausible is behavioral differences between extinct and present-day carnivores ---in particular, more contact between the teeth of predators and the bones of prey due to more thorough consumption of carcasses by the extinct species. Such thorough carcass consumption implies tothe researchers either that prey availability was low, at least seasonally, or that there was intense competition over kills and a high rate of carcass theft due to relatively high predator densities.

第7题,答案D



The researchers’ conclusion concerning the absence of demographic bias would be most seriously undermined if it were found that
(A) the older an individual carnivore is, the more likely it is to have a large number of tooth fractures
(B) the average age at death of a present-day carnivore is greater than was the average age at death of a Pleistocene carnivore
(C) in Pleistocene carnivore species, older individuals consumed carcasses as thoroughly as did younger individuals
(D) the methods used to determine animals’ ages in fossil samples tend to misidentify many older individuals as younger individuals
(E) data concerning the ages of fossil samples cannot provide reliable information about behavioral differences between extinct carnivores and present-day carnivores
我不懂的是A的解释,OG里说A是Support the researcher's conclusion.我没想通为什么。与本题相关的只有原文中粉色字体的部分。



而且OG还对本题解释说Lines 11–13(即原文粉色字体) state that demographic bias has been ruled out as anexplanation because older individuals were not overrepresented in the fossil samples. this implies that older carnivores would be expected to have more tooth fractures than younger ones.请问OG是怎么就imply出来了这么个结论??





我的理解:原文粉色字体是讲 researcher们排除了由于食肉动物分布而造成tooth fracture的这种解释,因为老的食肉动物在样本中比例是正常的——>推导出,样本中不能全是年轻样本,也需要有不同年龄层的,因为老年动物就是比青年的牙齿的损坏程度大(即OG解释中的this implies that older carnivores would be expected to have more tooth fractures than younger ones,加入了老年样本才可以称得上是一个比较合理的抽样。





我觉得自己这么解释的好牵强,望NN指点!!




收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2012-1-9 18:36:00 | 只看该作者
upup
板凳
发表于 2012-1-10 18:42:53 | 只看该作者
个人理解
推出OG给的imply:
首先文中说排除是统计原因是因为样本中的老动物不多。
那么反推,如果老动物多了,即第一段开头给的化石动物的牙齿损坏程度比现在动物大也可能是因为在化石动物的样本中年龄老的数量多。
由此得出老动物多意味着牙齿损坏程度大,即OG的解释。

OG的imply即是A选项,所以不是不是削弱是支持。

说话比较啰嗦,不会简洁概括,希望能帮到你。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2012-1-10 18:59:21 | 只看该作者
个人理解
推出OG给的imply:
首先文中说排除是统计原因是因为样本中的老动物不多。
那么反推,如果老动物多了,即第一段开头给的化石动物的牙齿损坏程度比现在动物大也可能是因为在化石动物的样本中年龄老的数量多。
由此得出老动物多意味着牙齿损坏程度大,即OG的解释。

OG的imply即是A选项,所以不是不是削弱是支持。

说话比较啰嗦,不会简洁概括,希望能帮到你。
-- by 会员 emmaweng (2012/1/10 18:42:53)



谢谢!!你说的一点都不罗嗦,我说那么多行,其实就是你这个意思。。。那就按这么理解了~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-12-6 23:19
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部