GWD-4-15,请教

2)Business Consultant:  Some corporations shun the use of executive titles because they fear that the use of titles indicating position in the corporation tends to inhibit communication up and down the corporate hierarchy.  Since an executive who uses a title is treated with more respect by outsiders, however, use of a title can facilitate an executive’s dealings with external businesses.  Clearly, corporations should adopt the compromise of encouraging their executives to use their corporate titles externally but not internally, since even if it is widely known that the corporation’s executives use titles outside their organization, this knowledge does not by itself inhibit communication within the corporation.

In the consultant’s reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

1. The first describes a strategy that has been adopted to avoid a certain problem; the second presents a drawback to that strategy.
2. The first describes a strategy that has been adopted to avoid a certain problem; the second is a consideration raised to call into question the effectiveness of that strategy as a means of achieving that goal.
3. The first describes a strategy that has been adopted to avoid a certain problem; the second is a consideration the consultant raises in questioning the significance of that problem.
4. The first is part of an explanation that the consultant offers for a certain phenomenon; the second is that phenomenon.
5. The first describes a policy for which the consultant seeks to provide a justification; the second is a consideration the consultant raises as part of that justification.

完全不理解为什么答案是A 为什么其他选项都错？谢谢

In the consultant’s reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

1. The first describes a strategy that has been adopted to avoid a certain problem; the second presents a drawback to that strategy.
2. The first describes a strategy that has been adopted to avoid a certain problem; the second is a consideration raised to call into question the effectiveness of that strategy as a means of achieving that goal.
3. The first describes a strategy that has been adopted to avoid a certain problem; the second is a consideration the consultant raises in questioning the significance of that problem.
4. The first is part of an explanation that the consultant offers for a certain phenomenon; the second is that phenomenon.
5. The first describes a policy for which the consultant seeks to provide a justification; the second is a consideration the consultant raises as part of that justification.

完全不理解为什么答案是A 为什么其他选项都错？谢谢

1.公司高管不用头衔是为了避免给公司内部沟通造成障碍；

2.但使用头衔可以促进和公司外部的沟通。

再看选项
A. 第一句描述了解决问题（沟通障碍）的方法（不使用头衔）；第二句描述了这个方法可能的缺点（不利于和外部沟通）；最好的答案

B. 第一句描述了解决问题（沟通障碍）的方法（不使用头衔）；第二句质疑这个方法（不使用头衔）对实现目的（改善沟通）的作用。显然不对。

C. 第一句描述了解决问题（沟通障碍）的方法（不使用头衔）；第二句质疑问题的意义。显然不对。

D. 第一句是对一种现象的解释，第二个是描述这个现象。驴唇不对马嘴。

E. 第一句解释采取一定的措施（不用头衔）的原因。第二句是对原因的考虑。显然不对。