新prep101

101.
            (31700-!-item-!-188;#058&006145)     (GWD 3-Q38/prep 2-6 different type)

Two computer companies, Garnet and Renco, each pay Salcor to provide health insurance for their employees.  Because early treatment of high cholesterol can prevent strokes that would otherwise occur several years later, Salcor encourages Garnet employees to have their cholesterol levels tested and to obtain early treatment for high cholesterol.  Renco employees generally remain with Renco only for a few years, however.  Therefore, Salcor lacks any financial incentive to provide similar encouragement to Renco employees.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. Early treatment of high cholesterol does not eliminate the possibility of a stroke later in life.

B. People often obtain early treatment for high cholesterol on their own.

C. Garnet hires a significant number of former employees of Renco.

D. Renco and Garnet have approximately the same number of employees.

E. Renco employees are not, on average, significantly younger than Garnet employees.

想不通！

顶。。

为什么是C？

难道是G公司给R公司的员工买保险吗？不解~

题目：G公司R公司从S公司里给他的员工买保险。s公司要求G公司买一种保险，能够早期预防C病。

      因为R公司员工普遍待的时间很短。

结论：S公司觉得此项目应用到R公司缺乏financial incentives。

weaken：其实并不缺乏financial incentives

如果G公司员工基本上原来都是R公司的，那么这些人在G公司还是要买保险，R公司其实是和G公司一样有financial incentives的。即C

C. Garnet hires a significant number of former employees of Renco.