ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4663|回复: 19
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD1-13

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-12-3 20:30:00 | 只看该作者

GWD1-13

Q13:


In the United States, of the people who moved from one state to another when they retired, the percentage who retired to Florida has decreased by three percentage points over the past ten years.  Since many local businesses in Florida cater to retirees, this decline is likely to have a noticeably negative economic effect on these businesses.



Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?




  • Florida attracts more people who move from one state to another when they retire than does any other state.

  • The number of people who move out of Florida to accept employment in other states has increased over the past ten years.

  • There are far more local businesses in Florida that cater to tourists than there are local businesses that cater to retirees.

  • The total number of people who retired and moved to another state for their retirement has increased significantly over the past ten years.  

  • The number of people who left Florida when they retired to live in another state was greater last year than it was ten years ago.

  • D怎么可以理解为不带来负面影响呢?想不通阿。。。。。。



    沙发
    发表于 2004-12-4 00:14:00 | 只看该作者

    我的理解不一定对,大家讨论.

    D错在TOTAL NUMBER.这个数量包括退休后移居FLORIDA的人数.如果移居他乡总人数增加,移居FLORIDA的百分比减少,也不能支持移居FLORIDA的人数就减少.


    [此贴子已经被作者于2004-12-4 0:14:09编辑过]
    板凳
    发表于 2004-12-4 02:59:00 | 只看该作者

    这题我也觉得答案有问题, A 倒是可以考虑

    地板
    发表于 2004-12-4 11:49:00 | 只看该作者
    the passage indicates the percentage drops, not the exact number. because the total number is increasing, it is possible the actual number of retirees increase intead, if the percentage drops slightly.
    5#
    发表于 2004-12-4 12:00:00 | 只看该作者
    我的意思是D是正确答案,可能我的中文表达有点问题,但是我的解释是对的.
    6#
     楼主| 发表于 2004-12-4 13:59:00 | 只看该作者
    Thank you 明白了!
    7#
    发表于 2005-10-11 06:02:00 | 只看该作者

    本人认为C更象正确答案。题目在问: most seriously weakens " noticeable negative...". 如果C成立,“noticeable negative on local business" 肯定不可能。


    请大牛指正。

    8#
    发表于 2005-10-22 11:19:00 | 只看该作者

    这题我选了C,我觉得D也有点像,但怎么也联想不到E,离开Florida州的老人多就是给当地做老年人生意的公司没有负面影响吗,离开F州的老大人数增多了和进来的老人比例下降有什么关系吗


    真是百思不得其解



    9#
    发表于 2005-10-22 14:22:00 | 只看该作者

    偶也觉得很纳闷,有点想不通答案为什么会是D。


    如果答案A也是一个前提,答案D就比较准确了。现在只能按Maggieyin说得那样去理解了

    10#
    发表于 2006-3-8 06:26:00 | 只看该作者
    应该是说United States退休依据的总量增加了,所以虽然Florida分到的少了,但是总量不一定减少,所以不会影响到当地的退休相关服务的收入吧??
    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 08:39
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部