以下是引用joywzy在2003-5-6 17:05:00的发言:
5. A gas tax of one cent per gallon would raise one billion dollars per year at current consumption rates. Since a tax of fifty cents per gallon would therefore raise fifty billion dollars per year, it seems a perfect way to deal with the federal budget deficit. This tax would have the additional advantage that the resulting drop in the demand for gasoline would be ecologically sound and would keep our country from being too dependent on foreign oil producers.
Which one of the following most clearly identifies an error in the author’s reasoning?
A) The author cites irrelevant data.
(B) The author relies on incorrect current consumption figures.
(C) The author makes incompatible assumptions.
(D) The author mistakes an effect for a cause.
(E) The author appeals to conscience rather than reason.
答案:C,我看了好几遍,都不知为什么是这个错误,能否讲讲?
谢谢.
这道题,我是这样想的。 前面一部分,有一内涵的假设:当消费量提高时才会提高税收收入,从而弥补财政赤子。 后面一部分,又有一内涵的假设:但消费量减少时才会有利于生态保护。 这两个假设是矛盾的。 所有C正确。 |