ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 641|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

争论中的GWD-8-Q20

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-8-13 17:18:00 | 只看该作者

争论中的GWD-8-Q20

以下是前辈的解释,但是小弟还是觉得困惑,请大家各抒己见。谢谢阿:)

GWD-8-Q20:  MingLiU","serif"; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: ZH-TW;">倒裝

Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.

(A.B.DMingLiU","serif"; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.5pt; mso-ascii-font-family: Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family: Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-font-kerning: 0pt; mso-fareast-language: ZH-TW;">爭議題)

  1. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also[C1] 

  2. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also[C2] 

  3. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland (especially in the Northeast) and giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also[C3] 

  4. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also[C4] 

  5. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created farmland (especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it[C5] 

   Answer:


 [C1]Not onlyMingLiU","serif"; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: ZH-TW;">放句首要倒裝, MingLiU","serif"; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: ZH-TW;">所以andMingLiU","serif"; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: ZH-TW;">之後應該用giveMingLiU","serif"; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: ZH-TW;">而不是gave. Not only…but alsoMingLiU","serif"; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: ZH-TW;">兩者後面所帶入的東西要相同屬性,MingLiU","serif"; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: ZH-TW;">本提前後含有轉折意味,MingLiU","serif"; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: ZH-TW;">不適合用not only but also. OGMingLiU","serif"; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: ZH-TW;">裡有提到but it also破壞了not only…but also的句型.

 [C2]Not only…but also兩者後面所帶入的東西要相同屬性,本提前後含有轉折意味,不適合用not only but also.

 [C3]後面用but also前面就要有not only除非是but it also就不是該句型.

 [C4]Correct. Createdgave平衡, itclearing清楚表示轉折句意.

 [C5]not only後面沒有but also.

沙发
发表于 2008-8-13 17:24:00 | 只看该作者

正确选项应该为B 

not only在句首所以前半句用倒装, 动词用过去式did所以A中表并列的gave错, but also 后的句子和前半句要对应用被动  but also为固定搭配,不能拆开

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-12-7 02:56
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部