费费逻辑41

girlwithwings · 发表于 2009-12-20 13:52:02

41. Raymond Burr played the role of lawyer Perry Mason on television. Burr’s death in 1993 prompted a prominent lawyer to say “Although not a lawyer, Mr. Burr strove for such authenticity that we feel as if we lost one of our own.” This comment from a prestigious attorney provides appalling evidence that, in the face of television, even some legal professionals are losing their ability to distinguish fiction from reality.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument

A. takes the views of one lawyer to represent the views of all lawyers

B. criticizes the lawyer rather than the lawyer’s statement

C. presumes that the lawyer is qualified to evaluate the performance of an actor

D. focuses on a famous actor’s portrayal of a lawyer rather than on the usual way in which lawyers are portrayed on television

E. ignores the part of the lawyer’s remark that indicates an awareness of the difference between reality and fiction

E 用排除法解决。因为A，B，C，D指出的错误原argument并没有犯。

“Although not a lawyer, Mr. Burr strove for such authenticity that we feel as if we lost one of our own.” 这句话我理解是 Burr虽然不是律师，但他努力演出以至于真实到仿佛我们失去了一个伙伴。

所以说律师并没有把fiction 和reality 混淆，他用了 as if

请哪位解释一下。

cynthia627 · 发表于 2009-12-20 16:12:36

我来解释。这道题我也错了。但是当时是因为做的太快了，没反应过来E的意思。
A：作者并没有说所有的lawyer都是这个意思。所以就没错。
B：我真的觉得这个没什么关系
D：这个都没提到，我觉得也没关系。
主要就是C和E。这个得看结论。结论就是说法律界的精英们都分辨不出来这个演员的角色是假的了（大概意思）。所以C没有问题。因为人家就说的是法律界的人看法律界的角色。而显然，在原文中，作者表达了这个演员的表演让他有时候觉得他好像是他们的一员。所以，这说明他知道他不是他们的一员。所以……

girlwithwings · 发表于 2009-12-21 02:14:24

我明白了，

结论说律师混淆了（但其实并没有）

问题是问这个推理错在哪里
--- 错在ingore 律师的部分话（其实律师是知道的）

费费逻辑41

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()