ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2066|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

一道费解的逻辑

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-12-29 05:49:00 | 只看该作者

一道费解的逻辑

15. After graduating form high school, people rarely multiply fractions or discuss ancient Rome, but theyare confronted daily with decisions relating to homeeconomics. Yet whereas mathematics and history arerequired courses in the high school curriculum, homeeconomics is only an elective, and few students choose to take it.Which of the following positions would be bestsupported by the considerations above?  BàC
(A) If mathematics and history were not requiredcourses, few students would choose to take them.
(B) Whereas home economics would be the mostuseful subject for people facing the decisionsthey must make in daily life, often mathematics and history can also help them face these decisions.
(C) If it is important to teach high school studentssubjects that relate to decisions that willconfront them in their daily lives, then homeeconomics should be made an important partof the high school curriculum.
(D) Mathematics, history, and other courses thatare not directly relevant to a person's dailylife should not be a required part of the highschool curriculum.
(E) Unless high schools put more emphasis onnonacademic subjects like home economics,people graduating from high school willnever feel comfortable about making thedecisions that will confront them in theirdaily lives.
正确答案是C,但为什么B不对呢?谢谢
沙发
发表于 2003-12-29 10:22:00 | 只看该作者
个人理解: B更象是支持above considerations的,而不是 "best supported by above considerations".
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-2 14:43
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部