ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1810|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教Section1 17

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-12-15 17:37:00 | 只看该作者

请教Section1 17

17.Companies considering new cost-cutting manufacturing processes often compare the projected results of making the investment against the alternative of not making the investment with costs, selling prices, and share of market remaining constant.
Which of the following, assuming that each is a realistic possibility, constitutes the most serious disadvantage for companies of using the method above for evaluating the financial benefit of new manufacturing processes?
(A) The costs of materials required by the new process might not be known with certainty.
(B) In several years interest rates might go down, reducing the interest costs of borrowing money to pay for the investment.
(C) Some cost-cutting processes might require such expensive investments that there would be no net gain for many years, until the investment was paid for by savings in the manufacturing process.
(D) Competitors that do invest in a new process might reduce their selling prices and thus take market share away from companies that do not.
(E) The period of year chosen for averaging out the cost of the investment might be somewhat longer or shorter, thus affecting the result.
没明白为什么选d呢,能把思路说一下吗,谢谢
沙发
发表于 2003-12-15 22:33:00 | 只看该作者
题干说公司要采用新方法的话,要比较采用新方法后的的结果和不采用新方法后的结果,比较的内容为costs, selling prices, and share of market remaining constant

     选项D说采用新方法可以使得share of market 扩大,那么象题干去评价新方法的话,是构成了disadvantage。因为题干只要求share of market remaining constant
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-18 10:54
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部