ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2615|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]GWD12Q8

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-3-16 06:07:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]GWD12Q8

Acting on the recommen-

dation of a British government

committee investigating the

Line high incidence in white lead

(5) factories of illness among

employees, most of whom

were women, the Home Sec-

retary proposed in 1895 that

Parliament enact legislation

(10) that would prohibit women from

holding most jobs in white lead

factories. Although the

Women’s Industrial Defence

Committee (WIDC), formed

(15) in 1892 in response to earlier

legislative attempts to restrict

women’s labor, did not dis-

count the white lead trade’s

potential health dangers, it

(20) opposed the proposal, view-

ing it as yet another instance

of limiting women’s work

opportunities. Also opposing

the proposal was the Society

(25) for Promoting the Employment

of Women (SPEW), which

attempted to challenge it by

investigating the causes of ill-

ness in white lead factories.

(30) SPEW contended, and WIDC

concurred, that controllable

conditions in such factories

were responsible for the devel-

opment of lead poisoning.

(35) SPEW provided convincing

evidence that lead poisoning

could be avoided if workers

were careful and clean and

if already extant workplace

(40) safety regulations were

stringently enforced. How-

ever, the Women’s Trade

Union League (WTUL), which

had ceased in the late 1880’s

(45) to oppose restrictions on

women’s labor, supported the

eventually enacted proposal,

in part because safety regu-

lations were generally not

(50) being enforced in white lead

factories, where there were no

unions (and little prospect of

any) to pressure employers to

comply with safety regulations.

GWD-12-Q8:

Which of the following, if true, would most clearly support the contention attributed to SPEW in lines 30-34 (“SPEW contended … lead poisoning”) ?

  1. Those white lead factories that most strongly enforced regulations concerning worker safety and hygiene had the lowest incidences of lead poisoning among employees.
                
  2. The incidence of lead poisoning was much higher among women who worked in white lead factories than among women who worked in other types of factories.
                
  3. There were many household sources of lead that could have contributed to the incidence of lead poisoning among women who also worked outside the home in the late nineteenth century.
                
  4. White lead factories were more stringent than were certain other types of factories in their enforcement of workplace safety regulations.
                
  5. Even brief exposure to the conditions typically found in white lead factories could cause lead poisoning among factory workers.

Answer: (A)

我选了E, SPEX contended 的是controllable conditions responsible for poisoning,要支持的这个观点 就是要找conditions in factory causes poisoning啊,和regulation无关啊 与A有关么?求教 没有讨论过呢

沙发
发表于 2010-11-3 13:24:56 | 只看该作者
同样表示不懂 我也选的E
A貌似与regulation有关 而不是controllable conditions
这么久了也没人来回答~
板凳
发表于 2010-11-3 21:06:37 | 只看该作者
是选A,答案就在原文如下

SPEW provided convincing evidence that lead poisoning could be avoided if workers were careful and clean
地板
发表于 2011-2-11 12:42:22 | 只看该作者
表示我也选的E。。。明明就是Line30~34. 这一句SPEW provided convincing evidence that lead poisoning could be avoided if workers were careful and clean 貌似是在后面出现的啊,题目指定的那一句确实只说了lead poisoning产生的原因,和regulation没有关系嘛。。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-11-30 09:42
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部