ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1758|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

难道"Unlike A, B do"不是ETS的优选结构吗???有一题就是搞不懂~~~~~~~

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-8-23 19:48:00 | 只看该作者

难道"Unlike A, B do"不是ETS的优选结构吗???有一题就是搞不懂~~~~~~~

Unlike using spices for cooking, in medicinal usage they are taken in large quantities in order to treat particular maladies.

 

(A) Unlike using spices for cooking, in medicinal usage they are taken

(B) Unlike spices that are used in cooking, in using spices for medicine, they are taken

(C) Unlike cooking with spices, taking spices for medicinal use is done

(D) In cooking, small quantities of spices are used, whereas in medicinal usage spices are taken

(E) In cooking, the usage of spices is in small quantities, whereas in medicinal usage they are taken                

我觉得C很好啊,,,当时一做这题,脑袋里马上闪过"Unlike A, B do"结构,,,因为我把这个结构收为ETS的优选结构了,,,可是怎么会是D呢...虽然我觉得D的语法也没错,但是C不是也对么?请大家帮忙看看~~~

沙发
发表于 2007-8-23 20:14:00 | 只看该作者

unlike或者like都是比较结构,都要注重对比的两个部分主语是否一致

abc比较的对象明显都不匹配啊

不能被所谓的优选左右啊~

板凳
发表于 2007-8-23 20:31:00 | 只看该作者

我来试一下

C) Unlike cooking with spices, taking spices for medicinal use is done

错误1:优选结构不是绝对正确结构。unlike A, B do 结构中,AB应为同类可比事物,如汽车贷款与租赁贷款的比较。此题中cooking with spices 强调烹饪,而taking spices强调使用,这两个概念无法比较。

错误2:taking sth. is done 显然结构错。

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2007-8-24 00:07:00 | 只看该作者

哦,,,对了,,,而且还有个明显的错误就是"taking spices in medicinal use"这件事怎么能被done "in quantities"呢!!!应该是spices in large quantities才对啦...谢谢二位...

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-25 05:08
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部