help! 黄皮og CR-14, 以前没有讨论啊

Within 20 years it will probably be possible to identify the genetic susceptibility an individual may have toward any partivular disease. Eventrally, effective strategies will be discoved to counteract each such susceptibility. Once these effective strategies are found, therefore, the people who follow them will never get sick.

The argument above is based on which of the following assumption?

The answer is C

C. All human sickness are in part the result of individuals' genetic susceptibility.

有一点我不明白,"any particular disease" 意思是任何一种特定疾病,any 有all 的意思,也就是说argument中已经说了C的意思: susceptibility to all disease 被counteract 后,人就不会生病. 原文不需要c这个assumption啊. 请大家帮我看看,多谢了

还是常识惹的祸！由counter susceptibility 推出never get sick,其实存在logical gap，LZ加入了常识认为argument推理很顺畅，其实 genetic susceptibility与sickness并没有联系，只有加入了C, sickness are the result of individuals' genetic susceptibility，我们才能由counter susceptibility 推出never get sick.

其实这个假设相当弱，由in part 可知。但是假设就是要一个必要条件就好，要求通常不高。

（分享做题启示：对演绎类题目，读文章要带critical thinking，留心发现文章的logical fallacy)