ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Early in the twentieth century, Lake Konfa became very polluted. Recently fish populations have recovered as release of industrial pollutants has declined and the lake's waters have become cleaner. Fears are now being voiced that the planned construction of an oil pipeline across the lake's bottom might revive pollution and cause the fish population to decline again. However, a technology for preventing leaks is being installed. Therefore, provided this technology is effective, those fears are groundless.
The argument depends on assuming which of the following?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 4320|回复: 14
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-28-9-->携隐修改标题(gmat-28_9)

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-8-31 06:52:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-28-9-->携隐修改标题(gmat-28_9)

Q9:


Early in the twentieth century, laceType w:st="on">LakelaceType> laceName w:st="on">KonfalaceName> became very polluted.  Recently fish populations have recovered as release of industrial pollutants has declined and the lake’s waters have become cleaner.  Fears are now being voiced that the planned construction of an oil pipeline across the lake’s bottom might revive pollution and cause the fish population to decline again.  However, a technology for preventing leaks is being installed.  Therefore, provided this technology is effective, those fears are groundless.



The argument depends on assuming which of the following?




  1. Apart from development related to the pipeline, there will be no new industrial development around the lake that will create renewed pollution in its waters.

  2. Other than the possibility of a leak, there is no realistic pollution threat posed to the lake by the pipeline’s construction.

  3. There is no reason to believe that the leak-preventing technology would be ineffective when installed in the pipeline in laceType w:st="on">LakelaceType> laceName w:st="on">KonfalaceName>.

  4. Damage to the lake’s fish populations would be the only harm that a leak of oil from the pipeline would cause.

  5. The species of fish that are present in laceType w:st="on">LakelaceType> Konfa now are the same as those that were in the lake before it was affected by pollution.

大家看,是B还是C?


个人倾向B 因为文章中已有:‘。。。provided this technology is effective。。。’


请指教。。。


沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2005-8-31 12:29:00 | 只看该作者

nobody cares...?


up!

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-9-1 00:49:00 | 只看该作者
upppp!
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2005-9-1 05:23:00 | 只看该作者

up again

5#
发表于 2005-9-1 08:57:00 | 只看该作者
应该是B.
6#
发表于 2005-9-1 09:10:00 | 只看该作者
B. C is a support, not an assumption.
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-9-2 03:57:00 | 只看该作者
thanks: howardwang and ESeraph
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-9-2 03:59:00 | 只看该作者
btw, the reference answer is c
9#
发表于 2006-1-6 15:28:00 | 只看该作者
B, no leak no pollution. C is likely supportive but assumption.
10#
发表于 2006-1-6 22:24:00 | 只看该作者

我选b。



a technology for preventing leaks is being installed----〉provided this technology is effective-------〉 those fears are groundless.


从放泄露技术安装,到假设这个技术有效,到不用担心,中间有个gap,就是,泄漏是唯一的污染顾虑。


请指教!


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-1 05:39
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部