ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1712|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

逻辑9

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-11-1 05:08:00 | 只看该作者

逻辑9

13. (?) Which of the following, if true, would most likely be part of the evidence used to refute the conclusion above?  A--àE(A) Accountants, lawyers, and physicians attained their current relatively high levels of income and prestige at about the same time that the pay and status of teachers, bank tellers, and secretaries slipped.(B) When large numbers of men join a female-dominated occupation, such as airline flight attendant, the status and pay of the occupation tend to increase.(C) The demand for teachers and secretaries has increased significantly in recent years, while the demand for bank tellers has remained relatively stable.(D) If present trends in the awarding of law degrees to women continue, it will be at least two decades before the majority of lawyers are women.(E) The pay and status of female accountants, lawyers, and physicians today are governed by significantly different economic and sociological forces than were the pay and status of female teachers, bank tellers, and secretaries in the past.
答案是哪个,为什么对?为什么错?谢谢,特别是A,对还是错呢?谢谢大家
沙发
发表于 2003-11-1 13:20:00 | 只看该作者
Could you kindly post the subject here?  I don't know what 逻辑 9 means
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-19 06:16
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部