ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2701|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

feifei 逻辑121

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-12-30 06:39:31 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
121. Observatory director: Some say that funding the mega telescope will benefit only the astronomers who will work with it. This dangerous point of view, applied to the work of Maxwell, Newton, or Einstein, would have satisfied their research and deprived the world of beneficial applications, such as the development of radio, that followed from that research.



If the statements above are put forward as an argument in favor of development of the mega telescope, which one of the following is the strongest criticism of that argument?



A.       It appeals to the authority of experts who cannot have known all the issues involved in construction of the mega telescope.

B.        It does not identify those opposed to development of the mega telescope.

C.        It launches a personal attack on opponents of the mega telescope by accusing them of having a dangerous point of view.

D.       It does not distinguish between the economic and the intellectual senses of “benefit”.

E.        It does not show that the proposed mega telescope research is worthy of comparison with that of eminent scientists in its potential for applications.

Answer E

文中推论错在哪里?不太明白E所说的具体例子无可比性的意思。

请哪位给出更详细解释
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2009-12-30 10:33:00 | 只看该作者
这里的Conclusion用了一个类比, 如果Maxwell, Newton, or Einstein这样的科学家和这些人观点一样狭隘的话,可能世界就享受不到这些发明所带来的便利了.

Premise就在于mega telescope和这些能实用类发明是否具有可比性.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-20 02:49
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部