og-7 关于最后一段的理解

In stressing the cultural determinants of a child’s

worth. Zelizer takes issue with practitioners of the new

“sociological economics,” who have analyzed such tradi-

(45) tionally sociological topics as crime, marriage, educa-

tion, and health solely in terms of their economic deter-

minants. Allowing only a small role for cultural forces

in the form of individual “preferences,” these sociologists

tend to view all human behavior as directed primarily by

(50) the principle of maximizing economic gain. Zelizer is

highly critical of this approach, and emphasizes instead

the opposite phenomenon: the power of social values to

transform price. As children became more valuable in

emotional terms, she argues, their “exchange” or “ sur-

(55) render” value on the market, that is, the conversion of

their intangible worth into cash terms, became much

greater.

我的问题是怎么理解这段话的层次关系。另外怎么理解划线部分的意思。先谢谢NN！！1

没人啊！自己在顶！！

我正在做这题:

我的翻译: Zelizer不同意新社会经济的实践者, 这些新社会经济的实践者只单从经济决定一切的角度来分析象犯罪, 婚姻,教育, 和健康这样传统题目.在个人的偏好形式中, 只给予文化力量一个小角色.

相反他强调对立的现象: 社会价值观念改变价格的力量.

大致的意思如此, 仅供参考.

同意楼上，

longvacation你可能句子没有看懂

thanks. Gmat is not easy!

表明Z不同意老观点+老观点+Z自己的观点。

In the last paragraph, the author explains how Zelizer’s thesis differs from that of sociological economists.

两种观点的差异

emphasizes instead the opposite phenomenon: the power of social values to