ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4678|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

(AI87)第一次写作文狡尽脑汁写的,还有10天就考了,请大家帮忙看看

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-6-1 10:06:00 | 只看该作者

(AI87)第一次写作文狡尽脑汁写的,还有10天就考了,请大家帮忙看看

写了一篇高频机警

87. “As technologies and the demand for certain services change, many workers will lose their jobs. The responsibility for those people to adjust to such change should belong to the individual worker, not to government or to business.”

Recently, as many technologies and the demand for certain services change substantially, many workers employed in these fields have lost their jobs. Some economists argue that the responsibility for the adjustment to the unemployment should belong to the individual workers and the government or business should not be blamed or show their concerns.To my own understanding, this issue can be analyzed taken into two facts into consideration.

Firstly,the cause of the obvious changes in the technologies and demands for services industry.As we all know, the economy of a specific industry or business is closely related to the technologies and the market demand, which can brought enormous profits to the development of this industry or business, whereas when the criteria is changed by the government which regulate the market due to some political reasons or business who gradually move on to another criteria to gain more revenues, they set a new standard on the market for other business to follow. Then, in order to catch up the market, the whole industry is going to accept the new technologies and the demands(not always caused by customers, for example, the propaganda could influent the customers’  preferences to some extent), which adversely cause workers who are familiar with  the old technologies to lose their jobs for living. Conclusively, one can not rule out the possibility that government or business is also responsible for the unemployment. They should try as hard as possible to help the individuals, on one hand,the government should establish some kind of retraining classes and approve some projects for finance these workers by supplying them with allowances, and subsidies to maintain the stability of the country, on the other hand, the business should give some compensations to the former workers to encourage them to find a new job.

However, the worker should not given up themselves as well and should not depend on the government and business merely, it is their only efforts to give them new chances to find a new job to survive. When a change happens, complain is not the best way to adjust to the change, which can not do any better to the situation, only dropping one into a awful circle.-When you surrender to your failure, you will fail again and again and never success. So workers should help adapt their skills and knowledge to the change of the industry and of the society, for example, they can re-enter the universities to learn a new technology or they can read more the books and search on the internet about the new demand, all this can well prepare them ready to the new requirement, they could also take the training courses the government supplies. Consequently, they can positively search new jobs on the job market. I m sure that with the updated knowledge the workers will find  new jobs that he is satisfied with.

To be conclusive, The responsibility for those people to adjust to such change should not only belong to the individual worker, but also belong to government or to business. Only when all aspects(parties) regarding the issue take the issue seriously could the problem really be solved.



沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2007-6-1 10:07:00 | 只看该作者

自己感觉有很多废话

我这个作文能得4。5分吗,得4。5分是我的目标不高


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-6-1 10:08:23编辑过]
板凳
发表于 2007-6-3 17:50:00 | 只看该作者

写的蛮好的。要是第二段加个例子就更好了。

考试时候也这么写分数不会低。

加油!

地板
发表于 2007-6-3 18:42:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用qianrene在2007-6-1 10:06:00的发言:

写了一篇高频机警

87. “As technologies and the demand for certain services change, many workers will lose their jobs. The responsibility for those people to adjust to such change should belong to the individual worker, not to government or to business.”

Recently, as many technologies and the demand for certain services change substantially, many workers employed in these fields have lost their jobs. Some economists argue that the responsibility for the adjustment to the unemployment should belong to the individual workers and the government or business should not be blamed or show their concerns.To my own understanding, this issue can be analyzed taken into two facts into consideration(不顺).

Firstly, (要空格!)the cause of the obvious changes in the technologies and demands for services industry(incomplete sentence).As we all know, the economy of a specific industry or business is closely related to the technologies and the market demand, which can brought(bring) enormous profits to the development of this industry or business, whereas when the criteria is changed by the government which regulate(s) the market due to some political reasons or business who gradually move on to another criteria to gain more revenues, they set a new standard on the market for other business to follow(too many clauses). Then, in order to catch up the market, the whole industry is going to accept the new technologies and the demands(not always caused by customers, for example, the propaganda could influent the customers’  preferences to some extent), which adversely cause workers who are familiar with  the old technologies to lose their jobs for living. Conclusively, one can not rule out the possibility that government or business is also responsible for the unemployment. They should try as hard as possible to help the individuals, on (the) one hand,the government should establish some kind of retraining classes and approve some projects for finance these workers by supplying them with allowances, and subsidies to maintain the stability of the country, on the other hand, the business should give some compensations to the former workers to encourage them to find a new job.

However, the worker should not given(give) up themselves as well and should not depend on the government and business merely, it is their only efforts to give them new chances to find a new job to survive. When a change happens, complain(t) is not the best way to adjust to the change, which can not do any better to the situation, only dropping one into a awful circle.-When you surrender to your failure, you will fail again and again and never success. So workers should help adapt their skills and knowledge to the change of the industry and of the society, for example, they can re-enter the universities to learn a new technology or they can read more the books and search on the internet about the new demand, all this can well prepare them ready to the new requirement, they could also take the training courses the government supplies. Consequently, they can positively search new jobs on the job market. I m sure that with the updated knowledge the workers will find  new jobs that he is satisfied with.

To be conclusive, The responsibility for those people to adjust to such change should not only belong to the individual worker, but also belong to government or to business. Only when all aspects(parties) regarding the issue take the issue seriously could the problem really be solved.

其实意思都表达到了,但是如果能有一个身边的或者生活中的例子会更好。比如IBM最近裁员的事情。

5#
发表于 2007-6-7 01:04:00 | 只看该作者
我背下来好了
6#
发表于 2009-7-26 20:58:00 | 只看该作者
UP!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 06:06
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部