ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1176|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd 4-40没有找到讨论

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-10-20 03:59:00 | 只看该作者

gwd 4-40没有找到讨论

Q40.

Many people suffer an allergic reaction to certain sulfites, including those that are commonly added to wine as preservatives.  However, since there are several wine makers who add sulfites to none of the wines they produce, people who would like to drink wine but are allergic to sulfites can drink wines produced by these wine makers without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites. 

 

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

 

A.     These wine makers have been able to duplicate the preservative effect produced by adding sulfites by means that do not involve adding any potentially allergenic substances to their wine.

B.     Not all forms of sulfite are equally likely to produce the allergic reactions.

C.     Wine is the only beverage to which sulfites are commonly added.

D.     Apart from sulfites, there are no substances commonly present in wine that give rise to an allergic reaction.

E.      Sulfites are not naturally present in the wines produced by these wine makers in amounts large enough to produce an allergic reaction in someone who drinks these wines.

没看明白:(

沙发
发表于 2006-10-20 23:11:00 | 只看该作者

取非削弱一下...

E取非的话就是S这种物质在酒内的天然含量足够产生过敏影响.

也就是说即使不添加S酒也会使人过敏.因为S就是酒内的一部分而不是添加进去的.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 12:18
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部