请教 GWD5-40

Q40:

It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on Mars
early in its history and that some were carried to Earth by a meteorite.  However, strains of bacteria from different
planets would probably have substantial differences in protein structure that
would persist over time, and no two bacterial strains on Earth are different
enough to have arisen on different planets. 
So, even if bacteria did arrive on Earth from Mars, they must have died
out.

The argument is most vulnerable to which of the following
criticisms?

1. It
        fails to establish whether bacteria actually developed on Mars.
2. It
        fails to establish how likely it is that Martian bacteria were transported
        to Earth.
3. It
        fails to consider whether there were means other than meteorites by which
        Martian bacteria could have been carried to Earth.
4. It
        fails to consider whether all bacteria now on Earth could have arisen from
        transported Martian bacteria.
5. It
        fails to consider whether there could have been strains of bacteria that
        originated on Earth and later
        died out.

It fails to consider whether there could have been strains of bacteria that originated on Earth and later died out.

这是E的问题.

D中说,如果所有细菌都是来此火星的话.....

那么显然就不会和地球的有很大区别.正好削弱了结论,来到地球的细菌都"挂"了.~~~~