ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1940|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[讨论]大全I-8

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-9-26 14:03:00 | 只看该作者

[讨论]大全I-8

Investing in real estate would be a profitable venture at this time. A survey in House magazine revealed that 85% of the magazine’s readers are planning to buy a second home over the next few years. A study of the real estate industry, however, revealed that the current supply of homes could only provide for 65% of that demand each year.
8. Which of the following, if true, reveals a weakness in the evidence cited above?
(A) Real estate is a highly labor-intensive business.
(B) Home builders are not evenly distributed across the country.
(C) The number of people who want second homes has been increasing each year for the past ten years.
(D) Readers of House magazine are more likely than most people to want second homes.
(E) House magazine includes articles about owning a second home as well as articles about building a second home.

answer:d

请问这道题要weaken的是什么?是第一句话还是最后一句?还有65%指的不是85%中的65%吗?那为什么选d??

沙发
发表于 2006-9-26 18:42:00 | 只看该作者
65%指的不是85%中的65%    那个that不是指的前面那句话
板凳
发表于 2006-9-27 02:08:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得是weaken第一句话,而原文说85%的读者想买房,但你不清楚读者一共有多少,d说杂志的读者更有可能买房,(把d带回原文,如果有100个读者那么85个想买房.而需求要远远高于85 (因为需求要包括读者和其他人)假如是需求1000栋,那满足了65%就是有650栋,而读者最有可能买,期于的都是想想,所以房子会有剩余,那也就weaken了第一句话-投资房地产是有利可图的

不知道对不对,还有待讨论


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-9-27 2:11:06编辑过]
地板
发表于 2006-9-27 17:55:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得weaken的是文中的观点,就是房地产有利可图。

65%是对所有购房需求而言,85%是针对杂志读者而言,不一样。所以65%与之前的85%并不矛盾,也就没有

所谓的供不应求的局面(造成房地产有利可图的结果),因此观点被weaken了。

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-9-27 19:54:00 | 只看该作者

3q明晰。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 08:08
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部