ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2113|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-III-8

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-9-26 12:19:00 | 只看该作者

大全-III-8

State X’s income-averaging law allows a portion of one’s income to be taxed at lower rate than the rate based on one’s total taxable income. To use income averaging, the taxpayer must have earned taxable income for a particular year that exceeds 140 percent of his or her average taxable income for the previous three years. People using income averaging owe less tax for that year than they would without income averaging.


Which of the following individuals would be most seriously affected if income averaging were not permitted in computing the taxes owed for current year?


(A) Individuals whose income has steadily decreased for the past three years


(B) Individuals whose income increased by 50 percent four years ago and has remained the same since then


(C) Individuals whose income has doubled this year after remaining about the same for five years


(D) Individuals who had no income this year, but did in each of the previous three yearsC


(E) Individuals who are retired and whose income has remained about the same for the past ten years


大家看看吧? 文章不是太懂,为什么选D呢? 先谢谢

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2005-9-26 21:02:00 | 只看该作者

一碰到关于税收的问题就晕, 大家帮帮忙吧!


自己顶


板凳
发表于 2005-9-26 22:31:00 | 只看该作者

应该是c吧?


恩,文章的意思是“那些在某个年份有异常高收入的人群(140 percent higher than the average level of the previous three years),可以申请根据income averaging的方法缴税,在这个方法下,缴的税要比在正常的税收方法下缴的税低,因此,如果不采用此方法,受最大损失的人群是----今年有异常的高收入的人群,即c

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2005-9-27 08:48:00 | 只看该作者

thanks 明白了


5#
发表于 2011-8-10 22:55:30 | 只看该作者
2楼解释异常明白生猛!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-21 05:34
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部