XDF绿皮书第70题逻辑请教

The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an organization was circulated to its members for comment.
When more than one nominee is to be named for an office, prospective nominees must concent to nomination and before giving such consent must be told who the other nominees will be.
Which of the following comments concerning the logic of the proposal is accurate if it cannot be known who the actual nominees are untiil prospective nominees have given their consent to be nominated?

A-the proposal would make it possible for each of several nominees for an office to be aware of who all of the other nominees are.
B-the proposal would widen the choice available to those choosing among the nominees.
C-if tere are several prospective nominees, the proposal would deny the last nominee equal treatment with the first.
D－the proposal would enable a prospective nominee to withdraw from competition with a specific person without making that withdrawal known.
E-If there is more than one prospective nominee, the proposal would make it impossible for anyone to become a nominee.

这道题选E。

根本不懂题干和选项的意思，更别说分析其中的逻辑关系了。哪位牛牛给剖析一下啊？
另外，觉得新东方绿皮书上的题目比OG要难不少，都说真实考试逻辑比OG难得多，不知比起新东方绿皮书又如何。

大姐,饭后我想明白了,就是一个矛盾.

好比一男一女搞暗恋,谁先提出爱另外一个的前提是他知道另外一个也爱他,结果完全不可能搞成功...

同意。 说假如有超过一个的候选人，每个候选人在同意候选资格前应该被告知其他候选人的情况，又说每个候选人在同意候选资格后才能被告知其他候选人的情况， 这是 一个矛盾，所以他的前提不成立，即不是超过一个的候选人， 那要么是一个候选人，要么多个候选人的话都不能成功。