ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4032|回复: 24
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[阅读小分队] 揽瓜阁阅读做题小分队 第101天 社会意识与通胀

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2021-7-9 06:21:20 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式

请大家在本帖回复:
1. 文章大概结构
2. 自己写的答案

解析+文章翻译明晚微信群里公布

报名活动,加微信号killgmat


In all industrial countries, the seventies were a time of slowdown in real economic growth. In some countries, people resisted the decline in real income growth and tried to maintain their accustomed growth in living standards by demanding higher wages and salaries. In other countries, where there was a higher degree of ‘social consensus’, it was recognized that such a wage-price spiral would be damaging to the society as a whole, and people accepted the lower real income growth without demanding a pushing up of wages and prices. In testing this hypothesis, researchers examined the experience of eighteen industrial countries in the seventies. It was seen that the differences in the inflation performances of these countries were well-explained by the indicator representing the degrees of social consciousness.

Two rationales are advanced for the role of social consensus. The first is based on conflict over the distribution of a known loss in aggregate real income, while the second is based on imperfect information regarding the size of the loss. The two rationales are not mutually exclusive, but the first represents a greater departure from economic orthodoxy than the second. Let us first suppose that there is a big increase in the price of imported oil and that the size of the resulting loss of aggregate real income is known to all. In countries having a high degree of consensus, each group of individuals may be willing to scale down its claim on output in the same proportion as the aggregate reduction. On the other hand, in countries lacking such consensus, there may be an unwillingness to scale down demands. In the latter case, inflationary pressures will emerge even though the process is ultimately likely to be counterproductive or irrational from the point of view of the society as a whole.

According to the second rationale, workers demand no more than what is warranted by productivity, and if they know that productivity has fallen or oil prices have increased, they are willing to accept a lower wage. However, workers will not generally have enough information to know the value of their contribution to production, and they will not necessarily believe statements by the firm that productivity growth has declined. They will not be certain whether such statements are true or whether these statements represent attempts by the firm to cheat them. Statements by the firms will have greater credibility where the firms have established a reputation for fairness than where there is a high degree of mistrust between workers and employers. The greater the degree of trust, the less will be the workers’ resistance to reduction in the level or growth rate of real wage.

Both rationales suggest that real wages may be relatively inflexible, at least in downward direction, when there is a lack of social consensus.

Source: Controlling Inflation: Learning from Experience in Canada, Europe and Japan – Clarence Barber, John McCallum


1. Which of the following can be concluded from the information given in the passage?
A. Economic slowdown causes inflation.
B. Unwillingness to scale down demands in the event of a known loss in aggregate real income prevents social consensus.
C. People's acceptance of lower real income growth can prevent inflation.
D. Reliable indicators of social consciousness exist.
E. Workers are generally resistant to reduction in the level or growth rate of real wage.


2. Which one of the following will most strengthen the author's viewpoint that lack of social consensus makes wages inflexible?
A. An agreement among workers that wage-price spiral is damaging to society as a whole.
B. A report that concludes that the high inflation in a given country is a result of its workers' unwillingness to accept lower wages.
C. Empirical evidence that the greater the mistrust between workers and employers, the more the inflation in the country.
D. A news report that a workers' union refused a wage-reducing proposal by its management.
E. A research indicating that inflationary pressures are likely to be counterproductive for a nation's economy.

3. The authors believe which of the following regarding the two rationales advanced for the role of social consensus?
I. Both the rationales challenge traditional economics.
II. Both the rationales explain the role of social consensus in inflation performance.
III. The rationales can co-exist.
A. I only
B. II only
C. II and III only
D. I and II only
E. I, II, and III


参考答案:
DDE


收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2021-7-9 09:47:46 | 只看该作者
ECC
板凳
发表于 2021-7-9 10:03:31 | 只看该作者
文章主要讲了社会意识在经济增长减缓中的原理和作用。

第一段交代悲剧,写了70年代经济增长减缓,一些国家的人民不愿意降低生活标准并且要求加薪,而另一些国家的人社会意识强并且意识到了这种加薪循环会对社会这个大整体造成伤害,所以后者更愿意降低收入增长标准。研究学者就研究了70年代的18个工业国家,发现这些国家的通胀表现能通过这些国家人民的社会意识指标来解释。

第二段就讲了两个社会意识背后的原理。第一个是基于已知的收入降低该怎么分配的冲突,第二个是基于这种收入降低规模大小的信息不透明。解释说两种原理并不互斥,但是第一种跟传统经济学原理有很大不同。 然后又具体讨论了一些有社会意识和没社会意识的国家是怎么愿意或不愿意降低需求的。没社会意识的国家就有可能会有通胀压力。

第三段讨论了第二种原理,具体举例讨论了公司statement和员工是否信服的关系。大概就是说一家公司平时越有reputation那么员工在这种时刻就越相信公司并且愿意降薪。

第四段一句话总结说,当没有社会意识的时候,薪资一般是不太flexbile的,至少朝着降薪这方面来说。

1 E
2 B
3 C
地板
发表于 2021-7-9 14:58:49 | 只看该作者
0. 计时 - 9分
1. 文章结构
回忆部分:
第一段讲了两个现象,在17世界经济下滑的时候,薪水降低,有些国家的工人会反对,有些国家的工人则会达成社会共识般地默认,这两种猜想值得深思。
第二段讲了这两种猜想
第三段讲了 - 忘了
再读部分:
第一段描述了两种现象。社会共识差异不同的两种国家在通货膨胀下的不同反应现象,提出社会差异能对国家通货膨胀表现进行解释。
第二段进一步提出两种原理,社会共识是如何对于国家通货膨胀进行影响的。
第三段提出了猜想二中间的漏洞,但是其实也是为了说明社会共识和信任具有影响力。
第四段总结缺乏社会共识会导致薪水无法灵活地调整。
文章类型 - 理论解释
2. 自己的题目解答
B
C
E
5#
发表于 2021-7-9 15:27:04 | 只看该作者
cdc 看看
6#
发表于 2021-7-9 15:34:22 | 只看该作者
Mark一下!               
7#
发表于 2021-7-9 15:41:22 发自 iPhone | 只看该作者
dbc
8#
发表于 2021-7-9 16:36:19 | 只看该作者
CCE DDE
题1.题2.


9#
发表于 2021-7-10 12:47:42 | 只看该作者
Mark一下!               
10#
发表于 2021-7-10 15:01:48 | 只看该作者
DCC
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-22 23:13
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部