ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In Washington County, attendance at the movies is just large enough for the cinema operators to make modest profi ts. The size of the county's population is stable and is not expected to increase much. Yet there are investors ready to double the number of movie screens in the county within fi ve years, and they are predicting solid profi ts both for themselves and for the established cinema operators.

Which of the following, if true about Washington County, most helps to provide a justifi cation for the investors' prediction?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 14029|回复: 26
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG12-14 无人问过~~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-4-1 11:52:32 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
14. In Washington County, attendance at the movies is just large enough for the cinema operators to make modest profi ts. The size of the county’s population is stable and is not expected to increase much. Yet there are investors ready to double the number of movie screens in the county within fi ve years, and they are predicting solid profits both for themselves and for the established cinema operators.

Which of the following, if true about Washington County, most helps to provide a justifi cation for the investors’ prediction?
(A) Over the next ten years, people in their teenage years, the prime moviegoing age, will be a rapidly growing proportion of the county’s population.
(B) As distinct from the existing cinemas, most of the cinemas being planned would be located in downtown areas, in hopes of stimulating an economic revitalization of those areas.
(C) Spending on video purchases, as well as spending on video rentals, has been increasing modestly each
year for the past ten years.
(D) The average number of screens per cinema is lower among existing cinemas than it is among cinemas still
in the planning stages.
(E) The sale of snacks and drinks in cinemas accounts for a steadily growing share of most cinema operators’
profi ts.

答案A肯定是对的···不过小弟我觉得B也很好啊,请大牛指正:

我的思路如下:

B选项:建在downtown地区,downtown地区肯定比较繁华,因此能吸引更多的人。Furthermore, 这个地区由于新建了电影院,这个地区原本不看电影的人也会来看了··所以B正确。

请大牛指正!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-4-1 13:08:46 | 只看该作者
结论的特殊性是新开的cinema可以make profits,
B选项是说开在DOWTOWN以促进那里的经济,那里的经济发展与make profits是两码事
另外,就算促进了经济可以带来更多的profits,但是这也只是in hopes of ,不是真实发生的事实,它可能发生,也可能不发生,所以不确定,不能选
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-4-1 14:44:32 | 只看该作者
恩~谢谢~
地板
发表于 2010-9-8 14:42:07 | 只看该作者
这种解释能够接受么,既然人口增长不变,那么有多少人进入看电影的年龄阶段就有多少走出看电影的年龄阶段,这可能会带来利润的增加么?
5#
发表于 2010-9-8 14:55:50 | 只看该作者
这种解释能够接受么,既然人口增长不变,那么有多少人进入看电影的年龄阶段就有多少走出看电影的年龄阶段,这可能会带来利润的增加么?
-- by 会员 kily8878860 (2010/9/8 14:42:07)


没有人说过“有多少人进入看电影的年龄阶段就有多少走出看电影的年龄阶段”,人口增长不变,人口结构也可以变的
6#
发表于 2010-9-8 19:06:53 | 只看该作者
哦,谢谢,是我臆想了,呵呵
7#
发表于 2010-9-17 15:31:07 | 只看该作者
最近又看到这个题,固然A是对的
但是B也不能说是错的啊
刺激了经济当然应该看电影的更多啊
OG解释说 While stimulating downtown revitalization is a worthy goal
这个做题的时候我怎么想的出来
都已经说是if true了,还说是worthy goal
有人可以解释一下么,谢谢
8#
发表于 2010-12-13 20:26:00 | 只看该作者
最近又看到这个题,固然A是对的
但是B也不能说是错的啊
刺激了经济当然应该看电影的更多啊
OG解释说 While stimulating downtown revitalization is a worthy goal
这个做题的时候我怎么想的出来
都已经说是if true了,还说是worthy goal
有人可以解释一下么,谢谢
-- by 会员 kily8878860 (2010/9/17 15:31:07)



请NN解释,我也不清楚!
9#
发表于 2010-12-13 22:02:59 | 只看该作者
Justifying assumption is a sufficient assumption, in constrast to a necessary assumption.  As such, the justifying assumption can directly lead to the conclusion in the stimulus.

A can accomplish that feat while B cannot since B needs an additional assumption - after the economy is revitalized, people will go to the cinema.  If people go to night clubs instead, the argument falls apart.
10#
发表于 2011-1-22 23:10:26 | 只看该作者
题干说most helps
这个prediction说make profits还是solid, for1投资者2电影院运营者

B in hopes of stimulation          revitalization显然都不是确定的利润(只要看电影的人数不变,就不能保证利润。而且在市里开电影院会增加成本)
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-1 18:59
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部