【求助】这几道题太难，真的完全没有思路，有NN给讲解一下吗？谢谢了！

熊不乖Aurora · 发表于 2017-6-30 16:51:25

如题。
Economic analysts, noting the sharp increase in ADHD-related disability claims over the past decade, have posited an epidemic of ADHD among younger generations. These analysts, though, ignore advances in psychoanalytical classifications. ADHD is now listed as an official psychiatric disorder in the DSM-5, whereas those with ADHD were simply treated as undisciplined and irresponsible in the past. Therefore, a greater number of serious cases are recommended now for disability, because Human Resources workers are more likely to identify these behavior patterns as ADHD.

Which of the following, if true, provides the most support for the argument?
A  Most economic analysts have no more than a rudimentary knowledge of psychiatric classifications.
B  Even though ADHD is a psychiatric disorder, coaching in skills related to responsibility and self-discipline help many such individuals lead more productive lives.
C  Human Resource employees now receive basic training in the psychiatric disorders that most commonly lead to disability claims.
D  In some cultures in the past, the lack of responsibility was viewed as one of the most serious moral failings.
E  According to studies, psychiatrists are diagnosing children with ADHD at increasingly early ages.

答案是C
万分感谢~

mephisto1015 · 发表于 2017-9-9 20:45:42

不是nn，尝试解答。
pre：ea说过去10年ADHD-related disability增多，他们假定了有一个ADHD流行病在青少年之间发生。
但是ea忽略了xx分类已经更新了➡️ADHD现在已经是psychiatric disorder了，而以前只是看作是undisciplined而已。
con：现在增长的这么多disability，只是因为Human Resources workers把these behavior patterns as ADHD.
注意：these behavior patterns指的以前的undisciplined。
support：可以证明pre没错，就是你得出结论的证据是正确的。

a，ea有没有知识和结论无关
b，讲怎么治病去了，无关
c，他们以前没有被训练，所以以前把那啥看作是undisciplined，现在训练了，所以就变成disability了。
de都无关。

ps，我觉得这道题最大的问题是看懂题干在说什么吧。。。

[逻辑小分队] 【求助】这几道题太难，真的完全没有思路，有NN给讲解一下吗？谢谢了！

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()